[情報] 11/25 Q&A

看板Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)作者hsinhanchu (hsinhanchu)時間11年前 (2014/11/26 21:21)推噓8(8推 0噓 10→)

留言18則, 14人參與討論串3/3 (看更多)

- Q: “Why does IS-4 have its historical gun, the D-25T, which is a joke on tier 10, while other tanks do not have such an alternative gun?” A: “There are already enough tanks in the game with “joke” guns” 「為什麼IS-4上面會裝一門在TX只能當裝飾燈桿的史實D-25T，其他車都沒有這種砲？」「遊戲裡還有很多戰車的砲都只適合拿來曬衣服啊。」 - Q: “The missions for Object 260 are too tough and there will be a lot of rigging” A (SerB): “I am already dreaming of how much butthurt will there be as a result of bans for rigging :)” 「Obj.260的任務太難了，一定會有一堆人作弊」 (註：目前看到的參考任務如下，可能還會改，以下都是單場： LT:8千偵傷 MT:擊毀3台至少比自己高一階的TD HT:傷害+坦傷合計14000以上 SPG:全隊最高傷害+最高經驗 TD:8千傷害) SerB：「別吵，我正在想到時候到底會有多少人作弊被鎖帳號之後會來哭哭....」 - Q: “Will you add bonux XP to tanks with more than 1000 battles?” A (SerB): “…and how about for simply downloading a client, we unlock all the tanks, give you all the premium ones along with a jar of jam and a bag of cookies?” 「單車打一千場以上會給經驗獎勵嗎？」「(SerB)：.......我想想，你抓完遊戲我們就給你所有金幣車，附贈一罐果醬和一包餅乾這樣好不好？」 - the fact that tanks traverse by “jerks” (unlike the fluid turret traverse) is historical 戰車迴轉時會頓一下（不像砲塔是平順迴轉）是史實考量 - Q: “Can we expect render range to be turned to circle in 9.5 or 9.6?” A (SerB): “Well, you can always expect anything” 「我們可以期待9.5就會把描繪距離換成圓形，還是說要等到9.6？」「(SerB)：你們當然可以期待任何事情發生。」（譯：WIDID） - it’s theoretically possible to change render range for each tank individually, but it’s not needed – the balance parameter is the view range, limited render range is a technical parameter that would be best removed altogether 理論上可以以單車為單位來改描繪距離，不過沒必要，因為平衡係數是以視野來決定的，把限制版描繪距離整個砍掉會最好。 - Storm states that a mod, which will identify not the shooter but only shell type will stay legal (possible), only mods that also tell you WHO shot you will be dealt with Storm表示顯示彈種的mod不違規，只有會在未擊穿狀況下也顯示開砲者的mod會被禁止。 - it’s not possible for WG developers to simply get rid of the noobmeter part of XVM (hence the idea of anonymizing players in battles) 開發組沒辦法直接把NM/XVM的數據去除掉(所以才會有玩家匿名的想法) (SS：反正看到匿名的不是爛番茄就是裝弱的unicum，一點意義都沒有) - developers are apparently not thinking about reducing the 25 percent RNG in penetration 不可質疑你的25%RNG - regarding the current announcement of Object 907 buff – Q: “Fuck this, they should have buffed it only after the third campaign for massive butthurt. ” A: “Yea, we thought about it :)” 關於907的buff─ 「靠北，你們應該在大外交競賽結束之後才宣布，然後看一堆人哭哭的」「喔對啊，我們有想過。」 - Object 907 was buffed because it was simply too weak, now it’s okay buff907是因為這輛車就是太弱，改完之後就沒問題了。 -- 30 second countdown, someone types the master plan: "All the noobs rush the hill and the rest def" random guy: "What is def ?" "You, rush the hill..." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 59.115.110.231 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WoT/M.1417008116.A.A57.html

推

condition0

11/26 21:39, , 1^F

11/26 21:39, 1^F

推

t0455453

11/26 22:06, , 2^F

11/26 22:06, 2^F

推

Pegasus99

11/26 22:12, , 3^F

11/26 22:12, 3^F