[情報] 9/2 Q&A

看板Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)作者 (hsinhanchu)時間11年前 (2014/09/03 00:47), 編輯推噓33(33056)
留言89則, 23人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
Please note that the last article about 9.3 changes was not correct in one point. Birch Gun 25pdr did NOT get removed, its internal ID just changed. 9.3的先行patch note有提到bitch gun的25磅被拔了,其實只是換名字。 - the “XP for damage, blocked by armor” will not be reworked to incorporate damage done to tracks, because “tracks are not ‘tanking’” 履帶吸掉的不算是坦傷害,「因為就是不算」 - M8A1 in the game is not called “Scott”, because Scott is the name for M8 HMC and not for M8A1 (which is generally not correct as well, the correct version would be M8 GMC). The turret that was removed from M5 Stuart in 9.3 is now in the game as stock M8A1 turret, turning the M8A1 into M8 HMC (“Scott ”) and M8 GMC hybrid. M8A1沒有被稱為Scott的原因是這個暱稱是給M8HMC而不是給M8A1(基本上這個稱呼也不正確 ,正確的稱呼是M8GMC)。從M5拔掉的砲塔現在是M8A1的白板砲塔,因此M8A1代表兩台車: M8 HMC和M8GMC Hybrid。 翻譯君註:HMC=Howitzer Motor Carriage,自走榴彈砲。 GMC=Gun Motor Carriage,約略等於自走砲。 - T92 Light Tank does not have an autoloader and will not have it in the game (SS: if it gets implemented) T92LT沒有自動裝彈機,所以遊戲中也不會有。 (翻譯君註:半自動裝填機,還是要由裝填手手動把彈藥塞進去。) - T92 Light Tank will not come in 9.4 and it’s not a tier 8 light tank (SS: as in, it’s lower), it will not come this year T92LT不會放在9.4,不是今年,也不會是T8(SS:會比較低階)。 (翻譯君註:T92和T71是平行開發計畫,所以放T7應該很合理。) - the Firefly branch will be a mix of LT, MT and TD’s (LT – M4A2, M3 Honey MT – Lee, Sherman, Firefly TD – the rest) 螢火蟲線會是MT-TD混合線。 我沒記錯的話之前說螢火蟲會是MT,這邊可能是SS筆誤或是WG改變主意了。 - WG is aware that some vehicles do not have correct crew setups, this however will not be fixed for now WG有注意到某些車的組員配置不對,但是短時間內不打算調整。 - there is a potential candidate for AFK Panther replacement, “now there is the ‘small’ matter of actually replacing it” (SS: the candidate is SP.I.C.) Awesomepanther可以換成別的車,不過「換這台車其實沒什麼意義」 (SS:可以換成SP.I.C) 參照這個 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/02/09/about-the-tier-8-german-lt-alternatives-spa hpanzer-sp-i-c/ TLDR:6噸,195馬力汽油引擎,極速58kph,90mm線膛砲,備彈18發。 - there are various ways of how to rework the German tree globally, but that won’t happen for the obvious reasons of such changes being too big 有很多方式可以重整德國科技樹,但是工程太大所以不會做。 - the alternative hulls will (as previously announced) most likely be tied to suspension changes (和之前說的一致)可替換車體會和懸吊變動一起實裝。 - there will more likely be no more than two turrets and suspensions/hulls per tank, as there is no real need for more 每輛車的可替換車體+履帶/砲塔基本不會超過兩組,因為不需要太多。 - the climbing ability of tanks in new physics will most likely be limited as it is now on maps in order not to break gameplay 即使新物理系統實裝,戰車的爬坡能力會和現在一樣以免破壞平衡。 - new tank sounds: “when it’s done it’s done” 新戰車音效WIDID - tanks turning on their roofs are not Havok-dependant 翻車不必然和Havok連動。 - T-54 and T-62 burn when hit from the front not because of transmission, but because of fuel tanks T-54/T-62正面中彈燒車是因為油箱全毀而非變速箱中彈。 (我以為這已經是基本常識了,T-54車體正面一邊是駕駛另一邊是油箱) - different e-sports formats will still be tested, it cannot be said which one will be final for now 新的電競模式測試中,最終版本未定。 - there will be new tutorial for newbies 會有新的新手教學。 - Japanese heavies will come sooner than TD’s 日本HT會比TD先出現。 - multiturret mechanism: “Noone needs it. We will make it at some point when we have no other things to do.” 多砲塔機制:「鬼才需要這個,哪天我們真的沒事幹了再來研發就好。」 - Roaming mechanism is not finished yet anyway, it has low priority 漫遊機制未完工,優先程度很低。 - Storm confirms that SerB was wrong when he hinted at implementing the Sturmtiger line. Sturmtiger will not come. Storm表示SerB說可能引入突擊虎線是口誤。 - Tiger II in HD: “when it’s done it’s done” HD虎王WIDID。 - developers are considering getting rid of trollplatoons (limiting tier differences in platoons) trollplatoon ban WIDID - a player proposed that the consumable price for new players on tier 1-4 would be cheaper than for experienced players (“sealclubbers”) – Storm states it’s not possible 某玩家提議讓T1-T4的新手可以用優惠價買到消耗品(虐菜的沒有),Storm表示不可能。 (o7 Mr.Reroll, carry us pl0x) - regarding buffs of some premium tanks (Matilda IV and its low firepower) – “when there are issues with actual tanks, we will rework them” Buff某些金幣車(例如只有45砲的Matilda IV) 「有實車資訊我們再來考慮」 - developers do not consider KV-1S to be overpowered, the KV-1S/KV-85 split is not a nerf, but a “rebalancing” 開發組表示KV-1S在一定的基礎上較好的實現了平衡,有關於拆車的決議代表了重新平衡, 而不是nerf。 (原本想寫的很像是阿共官方文件的,功力還是不夠...XD) - T-150 will not be rebalanced, for now at least T-150目前還不打算重新平衡 - rebalance of skills and perks will not come anytime soon 短期內不打算重新平衡技能 - it’s possible that the top tier Italian medium tank will be the Leopard with autoloader TX義大利MT可能是有自動裝填機的Leopard 1。 -- You think Brits made the best vacuum cleaner in the world? Try this French one. "Sucks harder than a Dyson, the ARL V39." -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 111.250.144.151 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WoT/M.1409676465.A.455.html

09/03 01:16, , 1F
太好了 果斷放棄豹ㄧ線
09/03 01:16, 1F

09/03 01:25, , 2F
日本重戰車......?
09/03 01:25, 2F

09/03 01:26, , 3F
所以會是九一式、九五式?
09/03 01:26, 3F

09/03 01:27, , 4F
還是オイ車www
09/03 01:27, 4F

09/03 01:28, , 5F
自動裝填豹一 叫現在的豹一情何以堪
09/03 01:28, 5F

09/03 01:31, , 6F
Vicker Medium Mk.Ⅲ 很需要多砲塔=_=
09/03 01:31, 6F

09/03 01:31, , 7F
開過的玩家應該能理解我說的XD
09/03 01:31, 7F

09/03 01:55, , 8F
現在的Leo 1太吃隊友了
09/03 01:55, 8F

09/03 02:34, , 9F
沒寫錯啊螢火蟲是分在MT裡的 看那個-和,號
09/03 02:34, 9F

09/03 03:54, , 10F
自動裝填豹一!? 那現在的豹一砍掉算啦......
09/03 03:54, 10F

09/03 12:19, , 11F
要有實車才會更換...但是有些車不是他們自己創的...
09/03 12:19, 11F

09/03 12:19, , 12F
?
09/03 12:19, 12F

09/03 14:10, , 13F
日本HT?kerker......
09/03 14:10, 13F

09/03 14:10, , 14F
可能比m4 45還軟....
09/03 14:10, 14F

09/03 14:26, , 15F
血很多,但是可能會特別軟,要以血換血
09/03 14:26, 15F

09/03 14:36, , 16F
回hhh WG有說過 除非真的沒車塞才會自己創
09/03 14:36, 16F

09/03 14:51, , 17F
但是日本二戰陸地上沒啥比較強的玩意兒,我比較疑惑
09/03 14:51, 17F

09/03 14:51, , 18F
HT上要裝啥炮,難道把海軍艦炮塞進去?
09/03 14:51, 18F

09/03 15:11, , 19F
T10HT有機會是オイ車 之前WG有去找這台的資料
09/03 15:11, 19F

09/03 15:12, , 20F
オイ車搭載的主砲是九二式十糎加農改良而來
09/03 15:12, 20F

09/03 15:13, , 21F
這款105砲特色是射程遠精度高 1000米穿甲是175mm
09/03 15:13, 21F

09/03 15:16, , 22F
把chi-ri換過去就好啦 反正DW2都能當重坦了
09/03 15:16, 22F

09/03 15:17, , 23F
DW2=重坦速度+中坦裝甲+輕坦的砲...坑死人
09/03 15:17, 23F

09/03 15:19, , 24F
中坦裝甲一定是有甚麼誤會 隔壁輕坦38na也是50哦
09/03 15:19, 24F

09/03 15:33, , 25F
九二式十糎不是1000M 175mm 是100M...
09/03 15:33, 25F

09/03 15:35, , 26F
オイ拿去當10階車只能是個天大的悲劇
09/03 15:35, 26F

09/03 15:36, , 27F
車體正面200mm垂直裝甲 還有個副砲奶頭
09/03 15:36, 27F

09/03 15:37, , 28F
穿甲彈穿深175 車體長11米 寬4.2米 車高4米
09/03 15:37, 28F

09/03 15:38, , 29F
組員11人 這台鬼東西要丟進WOT只能透過WG設計局之手
09/03 15:38, 29F

09/03 15:39, , 30F
喔 抱歉 オイ的11M是全長 不是車體長
09/03 15:39, 30F

09/03 15:41, , 31F
補充鼠式數據 全長10.085m 寬3.670m 高3.630m
09/03 15:41, 31F

09/03 15:49, , 32F
恩 100m175穿是九二式十糎加農的 但是オイ車同期開
09/03 15:49, 32F

09/03 15:50, , 33F
發還有ホリ車 此車搭載的是試製十糎戦車砲 可以達到
09/03 15:50, 33F

09/03 15:51, , 34F
1000m 175穿 所以オイ車實際要搭載的應該是此砲
09/03 15:51, 34F

09/03 15:57, , 35F
オイ的砲塔塞得下試製十糎対戦車砲?
09/03 15:57, 35F

09/03 16:07, , 36F
為何塞不下 又不是像四式五式車體太小連塞都沒得塞
09/03 16:07, 36F

09/03 16:08, , 37F
因為オイ的砲塔不大 小小一顆又全周200mm
09/03 16:08, 37F

09/03 16:09, , 38F
試製十糎対戦車砲的計畫一開始是自行火砲
09/03 16:09, 38F

09/03 16:09, , 39F
車體有足夠空間 擴大砲塔環是可行的
09/03 16:09, 39F

09/03 16:09, , 40F
砲座會不會大到塞不下オイ的砲塔我不知道
09/03 16:09, 40F

09/03 16:10, , 41F
恩 試製十糎有衍生兩台 一台自走 一台驅逐
09/03 16:10, 41F

09/03 16:12, , 42F
ホリ算是接近TD 但是車體空間很大
09/03 16:12, 42F

09/03 16:13, , 43F
然後試製十糎対戦車砲的彈體長度是123cm
09/03 16:13, 43F

09/03 16:13, , 44F
オイ那個砲塔不太像插了一根試製十糎対戦車砲之後
09/03 16:13, 44F

09/03 16:13, , 45F
裝填手還有能力裝彈的大小
09/03 16:13, 45F

09/03 16:14, , 46F
車體夠大 砲塔都能修改
09/03 16:14, 46F

09/03 16:15, , 47F
底盤不夠大的話 想擴大砲塔環門都沒有
09/03 16:15, 47F

09/03 16:15, , 48F
九二式十糎加農是分離裝藥 塞到オイ上面之後是怎麼
09/03 16:15, 48F

09/03 16:15, , 49F
也是個問號
09/03 16:15, 49F

09/03 16:17, , 50F
那就還是要經過WG設計局 因為オイ只有一台試作車
09/03 16:17, 50F

09/03 16:17, , 51F
一個砲塔 沒了
09/03 16:17, 51F

09/03 16:18, , 52F
オイ目前大多看到的模型 砲塔相對車體小很多
09/03 16:18, 52F

09/03 16:18, , 53F
喔 我是指120t計畫喔 不是100t那個老東西
09/03 16:18, 53F

09/03 16:19, , 54F
所以我才懷疑試製十糎塞不塞得進去
09/03 16:19, 54F

09/03 16:21, , 55F
是120T阿 車體太高 正面看還呈現錐狀 壓縮砲塔大小
09/03 16:21, 55F

09/03 16:25, , 56F
那跟試製炮原意只是要拿來打M4跟潘興,打在歐美德英
09/03 16:25, 56F

09/03 16:25, , 57F
的HT上會不會只是敲敲門而已?
09/03 16:25, 57F

09/03 16:26, , 58F
會 但是當時日本完全沒有敲那些車的打算
09/03 16:26, 58F

09/03 16:27, , 59F
有的年代也不一樣 所以其實沒差
09/03 16:27, 59F

09/03 16:28, , 60F
....WOT裡有差就是了
09/03 16:28, 60F

09/03 16:30, , 61F
會 試製十糎 當初設計目標只有1000m 200穿而已
09/03 16:30, 61F

09/03 16:34, , 62F
不過反正數據上WG都會"平衡" (採用的話)
09/03 16:34, 62F

09/03 16:37, , 63F
就算是九二式十糎 也可以透過WG設計局把它變成一門
09/03 16:37, 63F

09/03 16:38, , 64F
AP彈250穿 APCR325穿的魔改加農砲(無誤
09/03 16:38, 64F

09/03 16:59, , 65F
以前的Q&A不是說オイ車要放TierⅨ?
09/03 16:59, 65F

09/03 17:03, , 66F
那10階就只能放架空車了吧? 自衛隊又沒重戰車
09/03 17:03, 66F

09/03 17:04, , 67F
T9 オイ車 T10 オイ車(140t) 就解決啦~
09/03 17:04, 67F

09/03 17:09, , 68F
嗯 對 然後還會幫140t變出另一座神奇砲塔
09/03 17:09, 68F

09/03 17:10, , 69F
讓オイ可以裝上試製十糎対戦車砲改 偉哉WG設計局
09/03 17:10, 69F

09/03 17:16, , 70F
英國的都搞過了 日本的搞也沒差啦
09/03 17:16, 70F

09/03 19:08, , 71F
話說日本海軍的10cm高角砲(秋月級的)好像性能不錯?
09/03 19:08, 71F

09/03 19:08, , 72F
拿來當戰車砲可能嗎?
09/03 19:08, 72F

09/03 20:24, , 73F
秋月級的10cm是沒有...不過有其它的
09/03 20:24, 73F

09/03 20:25, , 74F
海軍短十二糎自走砲 http://goo.gl/sJhrTi
09/03 20:25, 74F

09/03 20:27, , 75F
海軍長十二糎自走砲 http://goo.gl/g6XTps
09/03 20:27, 75F

09/03 20:29, , 76F
短十二糎沒啥好講的 就商船自衛用的
09/03 20:29, 76F

09/03 20:30, , 77F
長十二糎就曾經裝在古鷹型、青葉型、妙高型
09/03 20:30, 77F

09/03 20:32, , 78F
高雄型等重巡上,也曾裝在航母赤城和加賀上
09/03 20:32, 78F

09/03 20:33, , 79F
09/03 20:33, 79F

09/03 20:45, , 80F
WOT的20.3cm自走砲和重巡的口徑一樣耶=w=
09/03 20:45, 80F

09/03 20:51, , 81F
倍徑...
09/03 20:51, 81F

09/03 20:58, , 82F
會這樣問是因為像俄國的D-10 S-70都是海軍砲改的
09/03 20:58, 82F

09/03 20:59, , 83F
然後日軍這個10cm砲似乎不錯 所以才問看看
09/03 20:59, 83F

09/03 21:00, , 84F
當然我知道叫陸軍去跟海軍要砲還不如叫陸軍自己生一
09/03 21:00, 84F

09/03 21:00, , 85F
一個新的還比較快..........
09/03 21:00, 85F

09/03 22:14, , 86F
那條螢火蟲線...喔不 又要開LEE XDD
09/03 22:14, 86F

09/03 22:46, , 87F
自由經驗怒跳!!!
09/03 22:46, 87F

09/03 23:06, , 88F
203mm就八吋砲阿...
09/03 23:06, 88F

09/05 15:27, , 89F
馬糞陸軍頭號敵人就IJN啊 第二敵人才是美國
09/05 15:27, 89F
文章代碼(AID): #1K1VInHL (Wargaming)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1K1VInHL (Wargaming)