Re: [報告] TES要宣戰??寄信給我

看板TribalWars (Tribal Wars)作者NineGon (Θ.Θ)時間19年前 (2006/10/12 16:03)推噓3(3推 0噓 1→)

留言4則, 3人參與討論串7/9 (看更多)

※ 引述《jele (平安回來我等你)》之銘言： : 我家這邊已經被TES包圍了 : 假如不打就訂NAP 以免我跟康康被分光 : 因為我只是替Harted鄰居報仇 : 在打他們之前harted也還沒宣布解散 : 總之這件事因為我是局內人基於利害關係排除原則 : 我不能參與決策討論 : 一切看大家 : 假如不想打就說我打錯人我是要打他們下面一格的FTR : 看要賠錢還是怎樣反正我錢也是不錯多啦別這麼說正因為與你有利害關係我們才特別需要你的意見因為我們總不可能排除你的利益、且不考慮你的危險而做出決定這樣絕對有違 PTT 保護盟友利益這樣一個原則我寄信給發出宣言的人並且得到回應 Dakota wrote: --> I do realize that there is no NAP between most of the PTT tribes and TES. If it was a single player attacking us from the tribe, we would have used diplomacy to try to resolve the issue. We have had four attacks by three different members of the W4CPTT tribe including one of the Dukes in the last two days. They do not appear to be isolated incidents. It appears that that branch of the PTT family has decided to declare war on our tribe. My point is that most tribes will at least declare war before they start attacking their neighbors with multiple attacks. Particularly so, since some of the attacks were made in conjunction with members of Hatred or upon villages that TES had captured from Hatred. If your tribes are attacking us to defend an ally, that is an honorable reason. My quibble is with the fact that no declaration was sent prior to the attacks. If PTTc54 does not support their sister tribe W4CPTT in their attacks on TES, please let me know and we will withdraw the declaration of war on PTTc54. 他首先回應我的疑問，說他瞭解 NAP 不包含大部分的 PTT 系統然後他說如果這是單一事件，他會先採取外交手段但是他們已經發生多起攻擊，所以不認為這是單一事件而認為這是 PTT 決定對他們發動戰爭他認為族與族之間的戰爭至少要有宣戰這個程序如果一族為了捍衛同盟而攻擊是一個有榮譽的理由上面只是省略之後的大意我覺得我們可以捍衛與 Hatred 聯盟關係為由我也覺得這樣的行為是正當的但是現在 Hatred 已經解散所以情勢有所改變變成是我們要直接面對 FTR 所以請考慮這一點如果要打，我們就要仔細的規劃一下；要談 NAP 也還沒有到不可挽回的地步希望大家能夠形成共識我個人的意見相當中立只是要打的話，請讓 c54 向 TES 宣告 NAP 的終止 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 220.133.24.55