Re: [心得] 3DSLL 實況機自行改造悲慘心得...

看板NDS (任天堂3DS)作者 (浮雲飄呀飄)時間12年前 (2013/10/20 23:30), 編輯推噓6(608)
留言14則, 7人參與, 最新討論串4/4 (看更多)
※ 引述《xrayxrayx (xrayxray)》之銘言: : 標題: Re: [心得] 3DSLL 實況機自行改造悲慘心得... : 時間: Sun Oct 20 21:29:21 2013 : : ※ 引述《momocom (momocom)》之銘言: : : ※ 引述《yuizero (14)》之銘言: : : : 推 MAGICXX:任天堂怎麼不快出實況裝置呢? 10/20 02:03 : : 因為任天堂本身就是反實況,最近的大事就是任天堂為了實況 : : 要告youtube : : http://ppt.cc/6jeA : -- : ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) : ◆ From: 202.159.160.17 : 推 SinclairH:真的原文跟上篇原po有出入 10/20 21:50 : 推 MAGICXX:可能上一篇的原PO也不知道吧 10/20 22:44 : → xrayxrayx:沒貼來源自然是自己翻的,怎可能不知道 10/20 22:52 不太喜歡發打臉文(momocom),但是當有人臉湊上來討打時就不能輕易放過。 http://www.ign.com/articles/2013/05/16/nintendo-enforces-copyright-on-youtube-lets-plays 原始網站連結備份,免得說翻錯篇。 Nintendo has started claiming ad revenue on user-created Youtube videos featuring its games, according to reports from Youtube users. 任天堂開始要求使用者自製的內容中如主打該社遊戲的話,要能分到廣告收益。 Nintendo does not want to block videos containing content that it owns from appearing on Youtube (as many film and music publishers have), but it wants to place ads at the beginning and the end of videos featuring Nintendo games, such as Let's Plays, with that revenue going to Nintendo as opposed to the creator of the video. 任天堂不希望擋下你管子中含有自家內容的影片(如許多電影與音樂產業所做過的),但 任社希望能在使用任家遊戲為主打的影片之前或後插入自家相關廣告賺取營收,如 LET'S PLSY。 Prolific Youtube channel owner Zack Scott has posted on Facebook about the demands. "I think filing claims against LPers is backwards," he writes. "Video games aren't like movies or TV. Each play-through is a unique audiovisual experience. When I see a film that someone else is also watching, I don't need to see it again. When I see a game that someone else is playing, I want to play that game for myself! Sure, there may be some people who watch games rather than play them, but are those people even gamers?" 該頻道擁有人ZS在臉書上表示,「我認為提出這樣要求是讓關係倒退。電動遊戲跟電影 電視不同,每次遊玩都是獨一無二的經驗。當我跟他人一起看電影時,我不需要再看一 遍。當我看別人玩遊戲時,我希望自己下去玩!沒錯,也許有人只喜歡看人玩,但這樣 還算玩家嗎?」 Nintendo has issued the following statement to GameFront on the matter: "As part of our on-going push to ensure Nintendo content is shared across social media channels in an appropriate and safe way, we became a Youtube partner and as such in February 2013 we registered our copyright content in the Youtube database. 任社對GAMEFRONT做出以下的回覆:「為了確保任社的相關事務能持續以適當且安全的 方式在各社交媒體中推廣,其中一步是在2013二月時在你管子的夥伴並在其資料庫登 錄我們的著作權資料。」 "For most fan videos this will not result in any changes, however, for those videos featuring Nintendo-owned content, such as images or audio of a certain length, adverts will now appear at the beginning, next to or at the end of the clips. We continually want our fans to enjoy sharing Nintendo content on Youtube, and that is why, unlike other entertainment companies, we have chosen not to block people using our intellectual property." 「對決大多數粉絲自製影片來說,這不會造成任何改變。但是,對那些以主打任社產 品,如使用影像與音效到一定分量,廣告會在影片一開始、稍後或結束時出現。我們 持續希望我們粉絲能在你管子上快樂分享任社內容影片,所以這就是為何我們不像其 他娛樂產業,不會禁止使用我們智權內容。」 Nintendo's right to protect its copyright is enshrined both in law and in Youtube's copyright guidelines, which state that just because you purchase something, it doesn't mean that you have the right to upload it. But this sets an uncomfortable precedent for Youtubers who make their living from Let's Plays and other self-created game content: they are now unlikely to feature Nintendo games, and if other publishers were to follow suit it would be a monumental shake-up. 任社對保護自家著作權的要求是合乎法規與你管子的規範,其內容說明並不是因為你 買了東西,就能隨意上傳。但是這對那些如LET'S PLAY一般,以此營生的人來說,是 個很不舒服的案例:他們可能不會主打任社遊戲,此外如果其他出版商也加入的話, 這件事會是個麻煩的里程碑。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.37.179.54 ※ 編輯: pichupichu 來自: 114.37.179.54 (10/20 23:38)

10/20 23:52, , 1F
其實一直針對這篇舊聞真的...稍微google下就可以看到據稱暫
10/20 23:52, 1F

10/20 23:52, , 2F
時LP youtuber已經又收到錢了
10/20 23:52, 2F

10/20 23:55, , 3F
然後比較新的像這個 http://0rz.tw/uRlzE
10/20 23:55, 3F

10/20 23:56, , 4F
感覺任天堂自己也還搞不清楚到底要怎麼作
10/20 23:56, 4F
你管子有全自動判別機制,只要廠商把影音上傳至資料庫,就能非常厲害的全部出來 糾出來。不要問我怎樣做到的,這是他們燒了無數錢財的資料庫系統。另外看該網頁 推文,其實其他公司也有這樣做,但是該網站的名嘴似乎是個性扭曲,故意到處宣揚 被任社擋下以打知名度。 追加補充最新消息: http://kotaku.com/1448796126/ 該人影片被禁發看來還有內情,似乎是該人用惡意批評遊戲的方式賺錢,被「其他」 遊戲公司(不是老任)盯上,因為拒絕協調最後被用著作權方式直接砍。

10/21 00:04, , 5F
搞不懂哪裡打臉 裡面哪裡有說任天堂反對實況嗎
10/21 00:04, 5F
請看原本momocom的文章,內容不但斷章取義還刻意扭曲。 ※ 編輯: pichupichu 來自: 114.37.179.54 (10/21 00:21)

10/21 00:26, , 6F
喔喔 你是針對原momo啊 那篇後半腦捕有夠多
10/21 00:26, 6F

10/21 00:27, , 7F
大概是最近老任作風天怒人怨吧 推文也沒啥批評他腦補
10/21 00:27, 7F

10/21 00:53, , 8F
根本沒看本文(以為是第一篇)
10/21 00:53, 8F

10/21 00:54, , 9F
以前唸過電子,練習用的電路板都會兩個點銲一起了
10/21 00:54, 9F

10/21 00:54, , 10F
小點的電路板銲接光想就覺得很容易出錯
10/21 00:54, 10F
※ 編輯: pichupichu 來自: 114.37.179.54 (10/21 07:25)

10/21 08:35, , 11F
最近老任作風天怒人怨XD,所以跟索尼罪惡滔天互相輝映嗎
10/21 08:35, 11F

10/22 04:20, , 12F
其實一開始也不知道是要打哪位臉就是(只是進來看熱鬧)
10/22 04:20, 12F

10/22 16:33, , 13F
就對人不對事嘛,反正都臭了再抹些沒有的屎也沒差,老任科科
10/22 16:33, 13F
※ 編輯: pichupichu 來自: 114.37.136.59 (10/22 20:25)

10/22 20:25, , 14F
奇怪一開始是就有人護航嗎?一堆人跟著罵老任才是對人不對事
10/22 20:25, 14F
文章代碼(AID): #1IO_SYnV (NDS)
文章代碼(AID): #1IO_SYnV (NDS)