[情報] 10/14 Q&A
今日跟風YA事件...就身在新竹114感覺好抖...
結果錯過黃金時間來翻譯了 囧
前面WG IIRC的首席製作人公布新的Master of Orion銀河霸主開始開發
- Q: “Why does T-44-85 have such a low penetration?” A: “So you
don't play it”
Q:「為什麼T-44-85穿深這麼低?」 A:「為的是不讓你去玩它阿。」
- Q: “When the Allies captured the entire German archives, was
there ever a case when the Allies had a look at the German
solutions and were like 'that's genius, we'll do that too'?"
A: “Yea, the entire French branch.”(later SerB states that
practically all post-war French tanks are based on German
drawings)
Q:「當盟軍擄獲了所有的德軍檔案,盟軍有沒有在看了德軍的坦克方案
,然後說:『這真是太精巧了!我們要不要也來搞一個?』的時候?」
A:「恩哼,你看到的整條法國線就是了。(然後SerB表示幾乎整條戰後
法國線都以德國的圖紙為基礎)
- one of the reasons for the optional unlockable hull solution is
the introduction of a number of vehicles into the game, that
didn't make it for some various reasons (for example something
else was occupying their tier already, too few modules etc.)
選擇可選車體做為未來遊戲內容的原因是,若是將一堆車子引進遊戲,那
有些型號的引進會變得沒有意義。(像是有些車塞不進去原本的線,或是
太少車體可以選擇等等)
- T-35 will apparently not be a part of a regular branch, it’s too
weak for tier 4 too
T-35明顯不會塞進一般線裏頭,它對四階來說也太弱。
- T58 (Heavy) apparently won’t be introduced, despite the German
150mm autoloader TD making it to the game: "It has armor,
Germans don't."
儘管我們做出了新德軍TD線,T58HT還是不會放進遊戲裡。「因為T58HT有
裝甲,德國新TD沒有。」
- SerB states that buffing viewrange of all tier 4 open-topped tank
destroyers to 390m would not be “more logical” than current
situation (SS: a player whines that Marder 38T has too weak
viewrange)
SerB表示將所有四階開頂TD的視野BUFF到390m不會比現在的做法更合邏輯。
(SS:有個玩家在哭說馬德38T太瞎)
- there are differences between 112 and 113 hulls
中國坦112和113的裝甲有一些不同處。(這問題想問啥?)
- SerB already has the T-44-85
SerB早就有T-44-85囉,很棒吧!
- apparently, this year, only 0.8.9 and possible 0.9.0 patches
come out
目前來看,今年確定會出8.9,9.0有可能。
- PzSfl.V is not called "Sturer Emil" in game, because it was
simply a nickname, equal to the SU-76 being called "bare-ass
Ferdinand" in Russian
PzSfl.V不叫做Sturer Emil的原因是因為那只是個暱稱,就像SU-76在蘇
聯管它叫做「屁股吹風的肥迪」一樣
- apparently, same case applies for Marder 3, but not Ferdinand,
which was official (SS: I am pretty sure Marder III was an
official designation at some point, will re-check)
承上一句,Marder III是同樣的情況(遊戲裡叫做Marder 38T),不過
斐迪南是官方名稱。(SS:我很確定Marder III是官方設定,我會再檢
視一次)
- premium Marder 3 SdKfz 139? “If necessery”
Marder III配上擄獲的蘇聯76.2mm砲作為金幣車?「必要的話。」
- the IS-3 driver's viewport is apparently modelled correctly
in game (SS: some player was complaining that when it was tilted
like this, the driver would see only the ground)
IS-3駕駛的潛望口做的很正確。(SS:有人抱怨那玩意做這麼斜,只能看
地板吧?)
- it's possible T-44 will get another alternative turret, the
T-44-100
T-44可能會有T-44-100砲塔可以選擇。
- WT E-100 gonna get a nerf compared to current situation?
"If necessery"
WT E-100會削弱嗎?「必要的話。」
- the German vehicles in game have the Balkenkreuz and not
Swastika, because it’s banned in Germany and WoT is active
on German market
德軍車在遊戲中漆上鐵十字而不是納粹標誌,是因為在德國納粹標誌是違
法的,我們在德國生意做的很大啊!
- there will be no changes to Object 140 in 8.9
下個版本Object. 140不會改。
- the tank hit decals (SS: those texture “holes”) disappearing
when new ones are created won’t be changed for now
坦克表面上遭擊中的貼圖(SS:我們管它叫做洞)會因為新的擊中貼圖而
消失目前不會改。
Also, Storm made a post, where he asks players their opinion on 8.9 – some
answers from it:
Storm也在詢問玩家對於8.9的意見時回應一些貼文:
- it’s too early to tell what exactly will be in 0.9.0
這時候談9.0會變成啥模樣還太早。
- devs will keep an eye on the T-44-85 stats, its possible that
the vehicle could get special limited MM (it would not meet
tier 8 or 9 tanks), but for now it’s too early to tell
開發組會密切注意T-44-85的數據,有可能它會有特殊的分房(不會遇到
八、九階車),但是現在說這還太早。
- a half of players writing on the reload timer wants bigger
numbers and a half wants smaller, for now it will stay as it is
一半玩家說裝填時間的字體大小要大點,一半要小點,那就維持原樣吧。
(譯:我不確定是不是指字體大小)
- it will be possible to choose a map in the next 7/42 battles
version
下個版本的7/42團隊戰鬥可能可以選地圖。
- Storm will balance the 7/42 tank profitability (how much credits
a tank makes) based on statistics, he wants the same
profitability as in random battles
Strom會根據統計數據平衡7/42團戰的收益值,它想要讓他能和隨機戰鬥
賺到的一樣多。
- driver's hatch on IS-3 is 60mm, it’s historical (“the thickness
of the plate from which it is cut”), it is not supposed to be
110mm as some players state – apparently there are some
schematics floating around that are incorrect
IS-3的駕駛艙蓋在歷史上是60mm(從切下來的板子測量得知),而不是有
些玩家聲稱的110mm,顯然有些流傳的圖紙紀錄是錯誤的。
- ST-I model (armor slope) is correct, WG specifically checked
ST-I的模型(裝甲角度)沒問題,我們特別檢查過了。
- apparently WG hired new sound department, they are testing,
the old records taken at army training grounds will be used
WG雇了新的音效部門,他們正在測試一些東西。而一些從陸軍教練場錄下
的舊紀錄會用。
一個小時...還算翻的蠻快的...(倒地
「和SerB有約」的翻譯我再找時間翻吧...
原文網址:http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/14/14-10-2013/
--
推
05/04 19:29,
05/04 19:29
→
05/04 19:30,
05/04 19:30
→
05/04 19:32,
05/04 19:32
→
05/04 19:33,
05/04 19:33
→
05/04 19:34,
05/04 19:34
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 111.251.230.225
推
10/15 04:51, , 1F
10/15 04:51, 1F
感謝更正 orz 明天早九好像有自虐傾向阿...(苦笑
推
10/15 04:53, , 2F
10/15 04:53, 2F
這真是...YA
推
10/15 04:54, , 3F
10/15 04:54, 3F
※ 編輯: tai33ru 來自: 111.251.230.225 (10/15 04:59)
→
10/15 08:45, , 4F
10/15 08:45, 4F
推
10/15 09:19, , 5F
10/15 09:19, 5F
推
10/15 09:47, , 6F
10/15 09:47, 6F
推
10/15 09:49, , 7F
10/15 09:49, 7F
推
10/15 10:24, , 8F
10/15 10:24, 8F
→
10/15 10:28, , 9F
10/15 10:28, 9F
推
10/15 11:02, , 10F
10/15 11:02, 10F
推
10/15 11:28, , 11F
10/15 11:28, 11F
→
10/15 11:28, , 12F
10/15 11:28, 12F
推
10/15 13:21, , 13F
10/15 13:21, 13F
→
10/15 13:22, , 14F
10/15 13:22, 14F
推
10/15 14:02, , 15F
10/15 14:02, 15F
→
10/15 14:03, , 16F
10/15 14:03, 16F
推
10/15 16:29, , 17F
10/15 16:29, 17F
推
10/16 19:22, , 18F
10/16 19:22, 18F
→
10/16 19:23, , 19F
10/16 19:23, 19F
Wargaming 近期熱門文章
PTT遊戲區 即時熱門文章