[情報] 10/02 Q&A
看板Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)作者lwo005 (Erich von Manstein)時間12年前 (2013/10/03 08:30)推噓16(16推 0噓 22→)留言38則, 20人參與討論串1/1
http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/10/02/2-10-2013/#more-3706
--
- next CW update will apparently bring gold transactions log for clans
下一次公會戰更新會提供公會金幣交易紀錄
- according to Tanitha (SEA server), there will be a transfer possibility to
SEA in the future
根據 Tanitha (SEA伺服器)的說法,玩家未來可能可以跳伺服器到SEA
感謝以下指正
→ cklppt :這翻譯... 第二條是指轉伺服器阿 10/03 08:46
- the Chinese Type 34 with 57mm gun is not the Soviet T-34/57 exported to
China, the Chinese mounted the gun themselves
中國 Type 34 裝的 57mm 主砲並非由蘇聯輸出的
中國人自己把這門砲給裝上去
- maps bigger than 1000x1000m are not made, because “a) it needs client
optimization so that the majority of players could play them b) it needs
somewhat different gameplay”
沒有做大於 1 平方公里的地圖是因為
a) 得把客戶端作最佳化才能讓大多數玩家進行遊戲
b) 這麼大的地圖需要一些不同的玩法
- Standard (old) graphic will not be removed in 0.9.0 (SS: some guy feared
they would be removed, Storm stated he doesn’t know of any such plans)
標準(舊)繪圖方式不會在 0.9.0 移除
(SS:有些人擔心會移除,Storm 表示不知道有這計畫)
- Storm confirms that the “arty HE shell kills no more than half or 3/5 of
your crew” rule applies only when the shell doesn’t penetrate
Storm 證實 "自走砲的高爆彈不會一次殺掉一半或 3/5 以上的成員"
此規則只有在未擊穿的情況下適用
- Jagdmaus is not planned for now
Jagdmaus 尚未計畫要做
- according to SerB, the best cooperation between WG and an archive/museum
was with Saumur in France, Bovington is not bad either, but SerB states that
since the WG EU office is in Paris, it was easier for geographic reasons
根據 Serb,和 WG 合作最好的資料館/博物館是法國的 Saumur
Bovington (英國) 也不錯,但是因為 WG 的歐洲辦公室位於巴黎地緣上法國較方便
- SerB also stated that when looking for info on planes, the archives and
museums were much more forthcoming because of the previous WoT communication,
he also states that the bigger problem with collecting info is not money, but
the fact some are classified
SerB 也表示尋找戰機的資料時,這些資料館/博物館由於 WoT 之前的交流
而更樂於協助;他也提到收集資料時錢不是最大的問題,而是有些資料被列為機密資料
- SerB states that the windows in walls on teh Abbey map are not bugged, a
guy was complaining that he shot thru the window but it registered like a hit
on the wall, SerB replied that he most likely missed
SerB 表示 Abbey 地圖裡牆上的窗戶不是 bug
某人抱怨他打窗戶結果就像打到牆上一樣,SerB 回應他應該是打偏了
- no sequels to the Wargaming game “Operation Bagration” are planned, it won
’t be turned to MMO, the is simply frozen
WG 的遊戲 "Operation Bagration" 沒打算要做續集,也不會變成 MMO,它被冷凍了
- SerB doesn’t consider 800×800 maps too small for tier 10 battles
SerB 不認為 800m*800m 的地圖對 T10 戰鬥來說太小
感謝以下指正
推
10/03 08:49,
10/03 08:49
- the option to disable maps you don’t want to play won’t be implemented
for now
讓你過濾你不想玩的地圖之選項現在還不會實裝
- currently the camo system works fine according to SerB:“within its limits”
根據 SerB 之意見現有的偽裝系統運作良好 "仁至義盡了"
- if you hit the tip (end) of the gun barrel, the gun won’t get damaged
如果你打到炮管的末端,它不會損壞
- the perk Deadeye has nothing to do with gun accuracy apparently: “There is
no corellation between where the shell will go within the aim circle and the
probability of a crit this perk”
乘員技能死亡之眼對主砲的精準度沒有影響: "砲彈會飛到瞄準圈內的哪邊
跟這技能有沒有發動毫無關聯
- HE shell mechanism rework is not planned
高爆彈作用機制的重製尚未完成
- the Jagdpanzer IV size in game is correct and historical
Jagdpanzer IV 在遊戲中的大小尺寸符合史實且正確
- the arty hardcap is still active
自走砲的數量上限仍然存在
(譯註: 一場中一隊不會超過一定數量的自走砲)
- there have been no experiments with fixed amounts of classes in battles
(SS: as in 4 meds, 4 heavies etc.), because “it’s considered not necessery”
沒實驗過在戰鬥中固定不同車種的數量(SS: 四輛中坦、四輛重坦之類的)
因為 "好像沒這必要?"
- the type of shell fired mostly from vehicles is taken into account when
considering buffs and nerfs, SerB confirms that the fact some tanks are
competitive only with gold shells is taken into account when considering
buffs/nerfs
車輛最常射擊的砲彈種類在考慮 buff/nerf 時會納入考量中
SerB 證實在考慮 buff/nerf 時有些車沒金彈沒人權的狀況有納入考量
- it was considered to nerf the Foch 155 and T1 Heavy gold shells, but this
option was declined for “various reasons”
曾經考慮過要 nerf Foch 155 和 T1 Heavy 的金彈,不過因為 "諸多原因" 而作罷
- no global buff for vehicles relying on accuracy is planned (SS: a player
was whining that before the increased gun accuracy buff, only accurate
vehicles could work on long distances, but now even previously inaccurate
vehicles can slug it out with snipers at long distances)
對於靠準度吃飯的車沒打算 buff (SS: 有個玩家抱怨在準度修正前
只有少數車可以長距離作戰,現在連以前出名的歪砲車都可以跟狙擊手在長距離叫陣
- Storm doesn’t think that the gun accuracy buff led to some vehicles being
seriously OP
Storm 不覺得射擊精準度的 buff 造成某些車過分 OP
- accurate guns themselves won’t be recieving a buff (to differentiate them
from less accurate guns)
本來就準的炮不會(為了跟歪炮作區別)被 buff
- the red line map edge barrier won’t be removed, Storm doesn’t like this
solution (when arties are for example standing with the back to this
arbitrary line and light tanks can’t circle around them), but they don’t
consider any other solution viable. The El-Halluf type borders (where the map
is bordered by sea/rocks) was not possible everywhere, as it wouldn’t look
natural – a player suggested “quicksand” or terrain with 0 passability,
SerB states it would look artificial
紅線邊界不會被移除,Storm 並不喜歡這樣的做法(例如自走砲用紅線藏屁股
讓輕坦不能繞著打)但是沒有其他的可行解。像 El-Halluf 那種以海岸、岩石
構成的邊界不是每張圖都適用,有玩家建議以流沙之類不可能躍過的地形為邊界
SerB 表示看起來太人工了
- removing the arty hardcap would not improve the battle waiting times
according to Storm
根據 Storm 移除自走炮的數量限制不會改善戰鬥等待時間
- the separation of random and company/CW statistics has “normal” priority:
“it’s done when it’s done”
把一般戰鬥和裝甲連、公會戰的戰績統計分開是中等優先程度,WIDID
- spotting damage in player statistics will be implemented
玩家的偵查傷害統計會實裝
- SerB states that the lowlevel light tank branches without high tier
vehicles are not interesting for players, “we checked”
SerB 表示沒有高階車的低階輕坦線對玩家來說無趣, "我們確認過了"
- SerB states that when the optional hull modules are implemented, they will
be tied to the suspension modules (as in, you unlock another suspension = you
unlock hull), elite vehicles will remain elite even if new modules are
implemented
SerB 表示車體選項模組實裝時會跟懸吊系統綁在一起(就是說,你研發新的懸吊系統
= 解鎖新的車體),就算有新的模組實裝了菁英車還是菁英
- T-34-2 has more shells of the same type than Type 59 despite being smaller,
because “the internal space left was smaller” (SS: as in, the tank was more
cramped)
T-34-2 儘管比 Type 59 小還是可以帶更多砲彈,因為 "Type 59內部剩餘空間比較小"
(SS: 就是說,Type 59裡面比較擠)
- according to SerB and Veider, French tree second heavy branch is ready, but
won’t be added now, because “there are other trees to have tanks added to
them”
根據 SerB 和 Veider,法國第二條重坦線已經完工了,但是現在還不會加進來,
因為 "還有別的分支有車要加進去"
- historical Lorraine 40t with 100mm or 120mm guns planned? “We know nothing
about that”
Lorraine 40t 的史實 100mm 或 120mm 主砲有戲嗎? "我們從來沒聽說這件事"
- there will be no hardcore mode: not so long ago, the developers tested it
again and it’s unplayable
不會有所謂的硬核模式: 不久前開發人員有再測試過沒辦法玩
(譯著: 沒血量被打穿就被打死的模式)
感謝以下指正
推
10/03 13:13,
10/03 13:13
- completely flat map is not planned
沒計畫做完全平坦的地圖
- yellow (damaged) tracks do NOT reduce tank speed – SerB: “We spent
especially half an hour with testers to check it out, tried with various
tanks – no speed reductions”. Storm goes even further:
黃(受損未摧毀)履帶不會降低坦克速度
SerB: "我們特別花了一個半小時請測試員測試不同坦克 - 不會減速
“Someone here asked rudely to doublecheck the alleged reduction of speed
with “yellow” tracks on Indien Panzer (top suspension). We checked. The
speed is not reduced. I want to kill somebody…”
Storm 更激動: 有人無禮的要求重複檢查印度豹(上懸吊)在黃履帶狀態下打嘴砲的
減速效果。我們查過了。沒減速這回事。我想殺了這傢伙...
(at this point, SerB got apparently pissed too and asked for a permaban for
the guy who was rude)
此時 SerB 顯然也很火大且要求永久水桶那個無禮的傢伙
- apparently, the missions window is bugged in the sense that “battles
remaining until the mission is completed” are not working, same goes for XP
and damage counts, it will be fixed (RU server only?)
顯然,任務視窗中"距任務完成尚餘戰鬥場數/經驗/傷害"是有問題的
之後會修復(只有RU伺服器?)
感謝以下指正
推
10/03 09:07,
10/03 09:07
- apparently, the sticking of the aim reticle to terrain feature won’t be
fixed, as it is basically a feature of the engine (SS: at least that’s how I
understand it)
顯然,準心自動去貼地形的現象不會被修正,因為那是遊戲引擎造成的
(SS: 至少我是這麼理解的)
- Maus is doing fine statistically
Maus 在統計上看起來表現良好
- not all tanks with increased credit gain coefficient are premium vehicles
不是所有賺錢係數被提高的車都是金幣車
- roaming will come “when it’s done”, it’s possible (“will be considered
”) that in connection with roaming there will be an option to permanently
migrate for example to EU server
伺服器漫遊 "WIDID" 可能(待考慮)永久跳(EU)伺服器的選項會跟漫遊功能一起出現
- while its too early to tell anything about the roaming mechanism yet, it’s
possible “crowds of noobs” will be prevented from using it by a winrate
limit and by limiting the roaming to players, who haven’t been punished for
spamming and profanity in chat (only recent punishments will be considered
apparently)
現在要討論漫遊的運作機制還早,可能會以勝率門檻或謾罵、人身攻擊違規前科
(最近違規紀錄)來阻止 "猴群" 大遷徙
- when a premium tank gold price gets lowered, there will be no compensations
to those who bought it for the old price
金幣車降低售價時以原高價購買的玩家不會被退費
- Q: “Will the Chieftain be implemented as tier 10 medium tank instead of
FV4202?” A: “No, because in game terms, Chieftain is a heavy”
Q: "Chieftain 會代替 FV4202 成為 T10 中坦被實裝嗎?"
A: "不會,因為遊戲中 Chieftain 被歸類為重坦"
- it’s possible that when tank tipping over is implemented, the ramming
mechanism will be changed too
可能在戰車翻覆實裝後,衝撞機制也會改變
感謝以下指正
推
10/03 08:55,
10/03 08:55
- WG chose the E-100 chassis for tier 10 German TD WT E-100 and not the
Waffenträger one,because “the light chassis cannot carry a gun heavy enough
” (SS: bullshit, there were 128mm/150mm WT’s planned)
WG 選擇以 E-100 的底盤而非 Waffenträger 的作為德國 T10 驅逐戰車
WT E-100 的底盤,因為 "輕底盤無法搭載夠大的炮"
(SS: 唬爛,明明就有 128mm/150mm 的 WT 計畫)
- WT E-100 gun will have the same penetration as the E-100 one? “Tests will
show” (SS: well, “some say” that currently the guns are identical on
supertest)
WT E-100 的主炮穿深會跟 E-100 的一樣? "測試中會公開"
(SS: "有人說" 在超測中現在是用一樣的主炮)
- if you want to report someone for insulting nickname, use the ingame report
for “profanity/insult” (SS: not sure how it is in english client, haven’t
reported anyone in ages)
如果你想檢舉某人的不雅 ID ,使用遊戲中舉報機制的 "污辱/人身攻擊"
(SS: 不確定英文介面中是甚麼,我已經好久沒檢舉人了)
--
翻譯機表示沒電了
我自己都想直接按END
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.113.128.84
推
10/03 08:42, , 1F
10/03 08:42, 1F
推
10/03 08:42, , 2F
10/03 08:42, 2F
→
10/03 08:45, , 3F
10/03 08:45, 3F
→
10/03 08:46, , 4F
10/03 08:46, 4F
推
10/03 08:49, , 5F
10/03 08:49, 5F
抱歉,文長看得有點眼花
※ 編輯: lwo005 來自: 140.113.128.84 (10/03 08:54)
→
10/03 08:55, , 6F
10/03 08:55, 6F
推
10/03 08:55, , 7F
10/03 08:55, 7F
→
10/03 08:55, , 8F
10/03 08:55, 8F
推
10/03 08:56, , 9F
10/03 08:56, 9F
推
10/03 08:57, , 10F
10/03 08:57, 10F
→
10/03 08:58, , 11F
10/03 08:58, 11F
再次抱歉,我真的該去睡了
如果還有錯請留言我睡醒一次改掉
※ 編輯: lwo005 來自: 140.113.128.84 (10/03 09:02)
推
10/03 09:07, , 12F
10/03 09:07, 12F
→
10/03 09:08, , 13F
10/03 09:08, 13F
→
10/03 09:09, , 14F
10/03 09:09, 14F
抱歉,修格式的時候把這段不小心修掉了沒發現
推
10/03 09:27, , 15F
10/03 09:27, 15F
→
10/03 09:28, , 16F
10/03 09:28, 16F
推
10/03 09:28, , 17F
10/03 09:28, 17F
→
10/03 09:28, , 18F
10/03 09:28, 18F
推
10/03 10:39, , 19F
10/03 10:39, 19F
推
10/03 10:44, , 20F
10/03 10:44, 20F
→
10/03 11:00, , 21F
10/03 11:00, 21F
→
10/03 11:01, , 22F
10/03 11:01, 22F
→
10/03 11:01, , 23F
10/03 11:01, 23F
推
10/03 11:08, , 24F
10/03 11:08, 24F
→
10/03 11:34, , 25F
10/03 11:34, 25F
→
10/03 11:43, , 26F
10/03 11:43, 26F
→
10/03 11:45, , 27F
10/03 11:45, 27F
→
10/03 11:57, , 28F
10/03 11:57, 28F
→
10/03 11:57, , 29F
10/03 11:57, 29F
→
10/03 11:57, , 30F
10/03 11:57, 30F
推
10/03 13:00, , 31F
10/03 13:00, 31F
推
10/03 13:13, , 32F
10/03 13:13, 32F
抱歉我誤解了,我以為是仿真操作模式
推
10/03 13:16, , 33F
10/03 13:16, 33F
→
10/03 13:16, , 34F
10/03 13:16, 34F
→
10/03 13:31, , 35F
10/03 13:31, 35F
→
10/03 13:32, , 36F
10/03 13:32, 36F
→
10/03 13:43, , 37F
10/03 13:43, 37F
※ 編輯: lwo005 來自: 140.113.119.182 (10/04 11:01)
推
10/04 18:25, , 38F
10/04 18:25, 38F
Wargaming 近期熱門文章
PTT遊戲區 即時熱門文章