[情報] 9/3 Q&A

看板Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)作者 (羽織)時間12年前 (2013/09/04 02:34), 編輯推噓28(28062)
留言90則, 35人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
原文網址: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/09/03/3-9-2013/ = - according to The_Chieftain, the US rebalance has been postponed from 8.9 till later 根據 The_Chieftain,美國線重新平衡的時程由 8.9 延後到後面的版本 - the Object 268 supposed “nerf leak” is still circulating RU forums, so once again, it’s garbage Obj. 268 "nerf 之後的樣子" 還在俄服論壇上傳播,再次聲明那是假的 - Q: “Why do you troll some questions and answers others correctly, it’s not fair!” A: “Want justice? Go to Hague tribunal.” Q: "為什麼你有的問題回答的很正經,有的問題就嘲諷,這不公平!" A: "要公平正義? 去找海牙法庭。" - M6A2E1 HT underperforming in regular MM spread? “How terrible…” M6A2E1 在普通的分房條件下表現得不好? "好貼蘿蔔..." - the current A-44 turret is the original project turret (SS: there were other variants too, with additional armor for example) 目前 A-44 的砲塔是設計案原本使用的砲塔(SS: 有其他型號,像是有額外的裝甲之類 的) - the fact left track is shifted a bit forward compared to the right one is apparently historically correct 左邊履帶比右邊履帶還要稍微偏前是史實上正確的 - SerB doesn’t like the stock Bishop too much apparently SerB 不太喜歡白板的 Bishop - SerB states that apart from newly unlocked tanks having better MM for a few battles and MM dropping you on top of middle of your team after certain number of games played at the bottom, there are no special coefficients influencing whether you will end up as the top tank of your team or on the bottom SerB 表示除了新解開的車有少數幾場的分房保護,以及你在連續幾場都是在隊伍底部 之後會分在隊伍前段/中段,並沒有其他的係數會影響你是分在隊伍頂端或是底部 - developers are considering the implementation of two screen support for WoT 開發組在考慮做 WoT 的雙螢幕支援 - WoT for MAC is being worked on apparently 目前正在做 MAC 上的 WoT - WoT: Blitz will work on iPad too WoT: Blitz 同樣的在 iPad 上也能跑 - WoWp and WoWs for pads? “No comment for now” 給平板的 WoWp 和 WoWs? "目前不予置評" - 8.8 test will be prolonged “if needed” "如果必要",8.8 測試會延長 - it’s possible to expect the T-44-85 to appear publicly in 8.9, but not guaranteed 可以預期 T-44-85 可能在 8.9 出現,不過不保證 - Panzer IV L/48 gun model has apparently correct length Panzer IV 的 L/48 砲模型長度是正確的 - no gun longer than L/48 was mounted on Panzer IV in real life 現實中沒有比 L/48 還要更長的砲被裝上 Panzer IV 過 - Q: “Will there be more maneuverability rebalance of other tanks?” A: “Maneuverability is not the only thing in the tank characteristics” Q: "你們也會對其他的車輛做操作性的平衡嗎?" A: "車輛的特性並不只有操作性而已" - SEA server was according to SerB started cca 2 years ago and it includes several countries of South East Asia, with the exception of Korea, China and Vietnam (they have their own servers). 東南亞服根據 SerB 所說大約於兩年前開始運作,並且包含了幾個除了南韓、中國和越 南(這些國家有自己的伺服器)以外的東南亞國家 - SerB on bringing the FV4202 to historicity: “If you ask really nicely, we’ ll give it a stock 84mm gun and remove the L7, that’s not difficult to do” SerB 對於讓 FV4202回歸史實的要求: "如果你真心誠意的請求我們,我們會給予它一 門白板的 84mm 砲並且移除 L7,這並不難做" - there are more than two more candidates for British tier 10, one of them is the Chieftain. Otherwise: “no comment” 有多餘兩輛可能作為英國 T10 的車輛,其中一輛是酋長式,其他的 "不予置評" - allegedly, the FV215b is a candidate for rebalance, but no details will be shared 據稱 FV215b 是下一個可能重新平衡的目標,不過不會公開任何細節 - Storm states that the reason for Tiger rebalance was that Tiger was terribly overbuffed when it comes to maneuverability – this was fixed. With the other balance changes, it recieved a solid buff all in all. The same goes for King Tiger – it was overbuffed agility-wise. The decision to reduce their maneuverability was intentional. Storm 表示 Tiger 重新平衡的原因是因為 Tiger 的操作性太過於強化了,這個已經被 修正。加上其他的更動使得 Tiger 得到全方面的 buff。同樣的事情也發生在 King Tiger上,這些降低操作性的更動是故意的 - Storm on King Tiger armor changes: “The turret front remained the same. The mantlet became 20mm thinner on some places, commander’s copula was buffed from 80 to 150mm, the hatch in the rear part of the turret became 10mm thicker. The bow machinegun stopped being a weakspot (earlier 120mm, now 150mm)” Storm 對於 King Tiger 裝甲的更動: "砲塔前裝甲和之前一樣。砲盾某些地方變薄 20mm,車長塔從 80mm 變成 150m,砲塔後部的艙門變厚10mm。機槍口不再是弱點(先前 為 120mm,現在是 150mm)" - load capacity of tracks is a balance thing, not a historical value 履帶負重量是個經過平衡的東西,而非史實的數值 - the model polygon increase will apparently come all at once 模型多邊形的增加會一次到位 - which vehicles will be buffed/nerfed in 0.8.9 will be known only when the 0.8.9 test comes live 8.9 會 buff/nerf 甚麼車要等 8.9 的測試開始的時候才知道 - Storm states that the programmers, creating the WoT code practically don’t visit WoT forums, they don’t reply to player questions either Storm 指出寫 WoT 程式碼的工程師不會造訪 WoT 論壇,他們也不會回答玩家的問題 - Storm confirms that the game code is being continuously rewritter for better optimization Storm 確認遊戲的程式碼目前正在不斷的最佳化中 - the 8.8 German rebalance is not tied to Historical battles, it is tied to the general attempt to increase the game’s historicity 8.8 德國車的重新平衡與歷史戰役無關,而是要嘗試著增加遊戲的歷史性 - the 8.8 armor simplification of some vehicles was made in order to make the game simplier for players, not as a software optimization. It was decided to do it in order to reduce the amount of confusing penetration/non-penetration situations 8.8 某些車輛的裝甲簡化是為了讓玩家更容易玩,而不是做一個軟體的最佳化。改變的 原因是因為決定要減少那些令人不解的擊穿/未擊穿情形 - no other suitable Taiwanese vehicles were found other than the premium LT 除了一輛金幣輕坦以外沒有找到其他適合的台灣車輛 = 完 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.231.19.163

09/04 02:53, , 2F
白板Bishop支援
09/04 02:53, 2F

09/04 02:55, , 3F
總覺得有人守在RU論壇專問台灣車問題 是誰?快承認吧
09/04 02:55, 3F

09/04 03:15, , 4F
四號曾經有想過要改裝豹頭+長75 但事實證明是不可行
09/04 03:15, 4F

09/04 03:38, , 5F
為什麼會有一個括號(坑)?
09/04 03:38, 5F

09/04 04:41, , 6F

09/04 04:51, , 7F
TX的M48A1可以當CM-12了....
09/04 04:51, 7F

09/04 04:53, , 8F
這台大巴頓很有趣...有90mm M41(M48~M48A2)和M68
09/04 04:53, 8F

09/04 04:55, , 9F
引擎則是一顆架空柴油引擎
09/04 04:55, 9F

09/04 06:49, , 10F
8.8測試服可能真的要挺久的 月底吧
09/04 06:49, 10F

09/04 06:49, , 11F
畢竟把很多原本就有的車更動了 玩家一定感覺的出來
09/04 06:49, 11F

09/04 06:50, , 12F
不是只是新增幾台沒玩過的車 接受度比較高
09/04 06:50, 12F

09/04 06:51, , 13F
左邊履帶偏前是...? 完全沒注意到呢
09/04 06:51, 13F

09/04 09:29, , 14F
居然在制作Mac版....以後可以不用開虛擬機才能在
09/04 09:29, 14F

09/04 09:30, , 15F
我的小白上玩了XD
09/04 09:30, 15F

09/04 09:49, , 16F
樓上不試試wine嗎?
09/04 09:49, 16F

09/04 10:47, , 17F
FV4202降階 10階補酋長也是可以接受啦XD
09/04 10:47, 17F

09/04 12:17, , 18F
到底是哪個小屁孩整天在那邊台灣來台灣去的
09/04 12:17, 18F

09/04 13:05, , 19F
哈哈 空戰出經國號比較可能
09/04 13:05, 19F

09/04 13:53, , 20F
1790-7V是真實的存在的汽油引擎.....
09/04 13:53, 20F

09/04 13:55, , 21F
*7B
09/04 13:55, 21F

09/04 14:08, , 22F
大巴頓除了那門M68外,剩下的應該都直接拿M48A1來用
09/04 14:08, 22F

09/04 14:11, , 23F
90砲有到M48A3啦,105主要是A4/A5,但前者因故未服役
09/04 14:11, 23F

09/04 14:13, , 24F
德國A2版則是我心中首選,可惜改裝年代太晚
09/04 14:13, 24F

09/04 14:35, , 25F
看到起火率12%,一直誤會是後期的柴油引擎xd
09/04 14:35, 25F

09/04 14:39, , 26F
我知道M41一直用到M48A3(很多橋下有實物)
09/04 14:39, 26F

09/04 14:40, , 27F
不過我上面似乎在打字時是想著換裝柴油引擎的時候 囧
09/04 14:40, 27F

09/04 15:23, , 28F
目前機動是架空沒錯,但虎式的裝甲也拉上去一點嘛...
09/04 15:23, 28F

09/04 15:38, , 29F
難喔 虎式真的是只有正面垂直約100~120mm
09/04 15:38, 29F

09/04 15:40, , 30F
最簡單就降階 這樣就可以保留史實裝甲配上史實短88^^
09/04 15:40, 30F

09/04 15:40, , 31F
1940~1943年的時候100mm裝甲擺個角度就已經很夠用了
09/04 15:40, 31F

09/04 15:40, , 32F
喔對了 還有前置起火變速箱
09/04 15:40, 32F

09/04 15:42, , 33F
把VK3601當虎式玩吧...
09/04 15:42, 33F

09/04 15:44, , 34F
自己改模組就可以感受虎式的威能了XDD
09/04 15:44, 34F

09/04 15:46, , 35F
淚推樓上...
09/04 15:46, 35F

09/04 15:55, , 36F
虎式到1944裝甲就顯得落後了
09/04 15:55, 36F

09/04 16:04, , 37F
因為從1943年中後 蘇聯開始用122&152直接爆殺動物團
09/04 16:04, 37F

09/04 16:06, , 38F
但在西線還是很吃得開 不過西線可怕的是飛機...
09/04 16:06, 38F

09/04 16:09, , 39F
不過大多人都只注意到"傳奇"的虎式 而忽略了表現不輸
09/04 16:09, 39F

09/04 16:09, , 40F
虎式有著優異表現的豹式
09/04 16:09, 40F

09/04 16:10, , 41F
螢火蟲可以對虎式造成威脅吧?
09/04 16:10, 41F

09/04 16:11, , 42F
不管怎麼說WoT裡的虎式就是悲劇...
09/04 16:11, 42F

09/04 16:12, , 43F
對了K大 可以請教為什麼豹式在歷史上評價這麼高嗎?
09/04 16:12, 43F

09/04 16:21, , 44F
基本來說 豹式的綜合評比優良 而且kwk42很強
09/04 16:21, 44F

09/04 16:23, , 45F
原來如此 這遊戲玩久了都默默開始認為德國很遜了XD
09/04 16:23, 45F

09/04 16:24, , 46F
可是豹式在遊戲裡只是個移動火葬場~
09/04 16:24, 46F

09/04 16:28, , 47F
那是因為一堆不存在的裝備落差阿XD
09/04 16:28, 47F

09/04 16:30, , 48F
那個機動性被砍得太差了,L/100看起來也很嘲諷xd
09/04 16:30, 48F

09/04 16:33, , 49F
WOT的豹式機動是被弱化了 還有接戰距離偏短裝甲吃虧
09/04 16:33, 49F

09/04 16:34, , 50F
高精確的砲也發揮不了多大作用
09/04 16:34, 50F

09/04 16:35, , 51F
淫蟲可以在1000米遠擊穿虎式跟豹式正面
09/04 16:35, 51F

09/04 16:35, , 52F
所以德軍注意到後都會優先攻擊長砲管的雪曼
09/04 16:35, 52F

09/04 16:36, , 53F
為了遊戲性把最大接戰鎖在500米 讓很多車沒法發揮
09/04 16:36, 53F

09/04 16:38, , 54F
"那台虎式瞄準我們了" "來人啊!快去把砲管遮起來!"
09/04 16:38, 54F

09/04 16:41, , 55F
因為史實上的交戰距離有時可以到1000米
09/04 16:41, 55F

09/04 16:41, , 56F
淫蟲乘員也知道他們長砲管很顯眼所以有些把砲管前半
09/04 16:41, 56F

09/04 16:41, , 57F
以德砲的準度 根本是在打靶...M4完全就是肉
09/04 16:41, 57F

09/04 16:42, , 58F
段塗白色的漆讓砲管看起來短一點www
09/04 16:42, 58F

09/04 16:42, , 59F
淫蟲一直讓我想到很奇怪的戰車本0rz
09/04 16:42, 59F

09/04 16:49, , 60F
德國短88跟長88的命中率真的很高
09/04 16:49, 60F

09/04 16:50, , 61F
短88 1000米 訓練命中率100% 接戰命中率93%
09/04 16:50, 61F

09/04 16:50, , 62F
長88 1000米 訓練命中率100% 接戰命中率85%
09/04 16:50, 62F

09/04 16:52, , 63F
因為德軍的瞄準器具很優良
09/04 16:52, 63F

09/04 16:58, , 64F
淫蟲的白塗裝其實沒有起多大作用,因為多半在後面黑
09/04 16:58, 64F

09/04 17:00, , 65F
槍(還是賣隊友xd),後來這種戰法被征服者繼承...
09/04 17:00, 65F

09/04 17:56, , 66F
史實黑豹的機動可是比三號高一個層次的
09/04 17:56, 66F

09/04 18:01, , 67F
當SERB NERF德車時我不說話 因為我不玩德車...
09/04 18:01, 67F

09/04 18:29, , 68F
我想應該永遠輪不到我說話 因為我玩蘇車(?)
09/04 18:29, 68F

09/04 18:29, , 69F
當SERB NERF美車時我不說話 因為我不玩美車...
09/04 18:29, 69F

09/04 18:31, , 70F
nerf過t-43了...沒人說話~
09/04 18:31, 70F

09/04 18:33, , 71F
T34-85被拔D10T是正常的= =
09/04 18:33, 71F

09/04 18:47, , 72F
每周都問他台灣車的應該夠了吧
09/04 18:47, 72F

09/04 18:47, , 73F
就說沒車了還一直盧
09/04 18:47, 73F

09/04 19:52, , 74F
所以FV4202要被拔去做高階金車了嗎?(儲金幣
09/04 19:52, 74F

09/04 21:59, , 75F
明天Q&A會不會說沒有找到適合的台灣砲車wwww
09/04 21:59, 75F

09/04 23:10, , 76F
『史實左邊履帶比右邊履帶還要稍微偏前』,為什麼?
09/04 23:10, 76F

09/04 23:11, , 77F
是因為地球自轉所以要偏轉效應嗎?還是其他理由?
09/04 23:11, 77F

09/04 23:11, , 78F
覺得問臺灣車的應該不是臺灣人而是大陸人,因為問的
09/04 23:11, 78F

09/04 23:12, , 79F
人好像很希望臺灣車編入老共的科技樹裡-_-
09/04 23:12, 79F

09/04 23:12, , 80F
連遊戲裡也想搞統戰.......滾啦~~~~~~
09/04 23:12, 80F

09/04 23:14, , 81F
台灣有自製甚麼戰車嗎 不然放進去沒意義吧-.-
09/04 23:14, 81F

09/04 23:14, , 82F
台灣嚴格來講只有拼裝車...
09/04 23:14, 82F

09/04 23:20, , 83F
大概是想在同一條線玩蘇美兩國車吧,真貪心.
09/04 23:20, 83F

09/04 23:21, , 84F
國民政府的車放到中國去好像也沒什麼不對?
09/04 23:21, 84F

09/04 23:26, , 85F
旗幟正確的話是沒什麼不對 但問題就在這
09/04 23:26, 85F

09/05 00:16, , 86F
放中國沒問題 但是上面的漆不對啊…
09/05 00:16, 86F

09/05 03:00, , 87F
推文好像都搞不清楚台灣跟中國的地位是什麼?
09/05 03:00, 87F

09/05 03:00, , 88F
所以接連產生這種車籍混淆的問題!
09/05 03:00, 88F

09/05 09:39, , 89F
我想,稿不清楚的應該只有樓上
09/05 09:39, 89F

09/05 10:29, , 90F
推jerry
09/05 10:29, 90F
文章代碼(AID): #1I9Yki7Y (Wargaming)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1I9Yki7Y (Wargaming)