[賽後] Ayukawa - Phantom

看板Hattrick (HT足球管理遊戲)作者 (安安安安安安安安安安安)時間12年前 (2013/04/29 14:52), 編輯推噓5(5019)
留言24則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
比賽對手 : Ayukawa Phoenix 比賽ID : 2159631 所屬聯賽 : 第二屆台灣甲級聯賽 (1164552) 賽前想法 : 鯰川是支防守型隊伍,基本上和我們的打法很類似。 在三位主力選手受傷的情況下,造成調度上十分地侷 限。曾經考良過利用防守反擊的戰術,但是在攻擊力 不足,傳球技能不高,再加上中場評比相近的情勢之 下,是個風險非常高的行為。因此,就單純以加強防 穩固中場為前提,力求踢和。 比賽過程 : 24' Phantom put themselves up 0 - 1 from the left 24' Phantom adjusted their style of play 31' Ayukawa resulted in a counterattack, but the keeper made a spectacular diving save. 33' Ayukawa makes the score 1 - 1 from the left. 39' Ayukawa missed the opportnuity of the counterattack again. 45' 1 - 1 was the halftime score. possession: 45:55 --------------------------------------------------------- 60' The Ayukawa manager wanted to try a new tactic. 76' 程 (Cheng) 興青 (Xingqing) who is a player of Ayukawa leaved off the field and Bojan took his place. 76' Phantom missed the indirct free kick. 78' 杜 (Du) 存江 (Cunjiang) reluctantly made way for 游 (You) 少威 (Shaowei) on the pitch. 78' Ayukawa is lack of experience 80' Ayukawa missed the opportunity from the middle 90' 1 - 1 was the halftime score. possession: 46:54 賽後評級 : Ayukawa Midfield poor (3) (very low) Phantom Midfield poor (3) (high) Ayukawa Right defence inadequate (5) (very high) Phantom Left attack poor (3) (very high) Ayukawa Central defence inadequate (5) (very high) Phantom Central attack wretched (2) (low) Ayukawa Left defence inadequate (5) (very high) Phantom Right attack inadequate (5) (low) Ayukawa Right attack weak (4) (high) Phantom Left defence passable (6) (low) Ayukawa Central attack weak (4) (very low) Phantom Central defence inadequate (5) (very low) Ayukawa Left attack inadequate (5) (very low) Phantom Right defence passable (6) (low) Indirect set pieces Ayukawa Defence weak (4) (very high) Phantom Attack poor (3) (very high) Ayukawa Attack weak (4) (low) Phantom Defence weak (4) (very high) Team attitude Ayukawa Phantom Tactic Counter-attacks Attack on wings Tactic skill formidable (9) excellent (8) 感想 : 事實上,我在 24 分下的指令是降低右翼攻擊,轉而穩固中場, 可惜穩固中場的效果並沒有想像中的有效率。不過,但這只不過 是事後諸葛,我認為這場比賽誰勝誰負都是有可能的,是一場好 比賽。 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 140.112.25.105

04/29 14:57, , 1F
感覺你的勝率應該還是高一點點 ?
04/29 14:57, 1F

04/29 15:03, , 2F
24分鐘就下穩固中場的指令 = = !!!!
04/29 15:03, 2F

04/29 15:11, , 3F
因為我 24 分就得一分了 哈哈~~~
04/29 15:11, 3F

04/29 15:11, , 4F
雖然說是穩固中場,不過還沒有完全放棄右翼的進攻~~
04/29 15:11, 4F

04/29 15:12, , 5F
只不過~~這個指令造成右翼的進攻率大幅降低~
04/29 15:12, 5F

04/29 15:14, , 6F
但也不能完全說這樣不好~~只是因為對上防反~
04/29 15:14, 6F

04/29 15:14, , 7F
效果不大而已~
04/29 15:14, 7F

04/29 15:14, , 8F
會不會有點早 ?
04/29 15:14, 8F

04/29 15:15, , 9F
很難說~~我想過這個問題~~
04/29 15:15, 9F

04/29 15:16, , 10F
只是最後決定增加持球率~~減少對方的機會~~
04/29 15:16, 10F

04/29 15:17, , 11F
而且~這個指令的影響~~進攻率還是在可接受範圍~
04/29 15:17, 11F

04/29 17:07, , 12F
我不懂~~鳳凰採 CA 的戰術~~可是前鋒要後退~~
04/29 17:07, 12F

04/29 17:08, , 13F
往雙翼不是應該比較有攻擊性嗎?
04/29 17:08, 13F

04/29 17:08, , 14F
或者用正常也好~~
04/29 17:08, 14F

04/29 19:19, , 15F
中場太弱了 前鋒不幫忙一下中場會輸太多 讓中前衛往前
04/29 19:19, 15F

04/29 19:20, , 16F
提高中路進攻 等於拿防守換中場
04/29 19:20, 16F

04/29 19:21, , 17F
下半場看狀況不對前鋒就靠邊啦 可是也沒用 XD
04/29 19:21, 17F

04/29 20:33, , 18F
用 CA 的話~~不用理會中場~~ 反而是要加強進攻和防守~~
04/29 20:33, 18F

04/29 20:43, , 19F
CA也不能讓對手爽爽射 射個六七球可 射十球會被射爆的
04/29 20:43, 19F

04/29 20:55, , 20F
對手射失敗就是你的機會了~~
04/29 20:55, 20F

04/29 20:55, , 21F
所以攻擊要夠強~~CA才不會被破壞掉~~
04/29 20:55, 21F

04/29 21:00, , 22F
我今天用遠射,只有一個遠射被反擊
04/29 21:00, 22F

04/29 21:01, , 23F
不過還是不知道遠射對於防反的效果
04/29 21:01, 23F

04/29 21:04, , 24F
應該還不錯吧?我們這場出現兩次防反~~
04/29 21:04, 24F
文章代碼(AID): #1HVXYgAJ (Hattrick)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1HVXYgAJ (Hattrick)