[情報] 超測UK有頭TD & US LT更動及其他消息

看板Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)作者scoMico (測試)時間8年前 (2017/08/11 18:57)推噓14(16推 2噓 10→)

留言28則, 15人參與討論串1/1

資料來源: https://goo.gl/4YZxTA https://goo.gl/kC2234 https://goo.gl/8URAxb https://goo.gl/zviRv1 https://goo.gl/NEgbzN https://goo.gl/pLrxgD ================================== 英國有頭TD改動: https://i2.wp.com/i.imgur.com/hlUJUk0.jpg

Challenger Turret traverse speed: 18 °/s Max. speed: 52 / -20 km/h 砲塔迴轉速度: 每秒 18 度速限: 時速 52 / -20 公里 Gun: 2-pdr AT Gun Mk. II (this might be a typo, but who knows yes it was a typo, look at the bottom of the article – it’s a new gun btw.) 新砲管: 32磅砲 Damage: 280 / 280 / 370 Penetration: 220 / 252 / 47 Reload speed: 7,8 s Accuracy: 0,35 Aim time: 2,0 s Gun depression: -10 砲傷: 280 / 280 / 370 穿深: 220 / 252 / 47 裝填時間: 7.8 秒準度: 0.35 瞄準時間: 2.0秒俯仰角: -10 / 20 度 FV4004 Conway Turret traverse speed: 18 °/s Max. speed: 50 / -20 km/h (from 35/-20) 砲塔迴轉速度: 每秒 18 度速限: 時速 35 / -20 公里 -> 時速 50 / -20 公里 Gun: B.L. 5.5-in. AT Gun 新砲管: 5.5吋砲 Damage: 600 / 770 / 770 Penetration: 260 / 200 / 70 Reload speed:: 14,4 s Accuracy: 0,38 Aim time: 2,4 s Gun depression: -10 砲傷: 600 / 770 / 770 穿深: 260 / 200 / 70 裝填時間: 14.4 秒準度: 0.38 瞄準時間: 2.4 秒俯仰角: -10 / 10 度 FV4005 Stage II Turret traverse speed: 16 °/s (from 12) Max. speed: 50 / -15 km/h (from 35/-12) 砲塔迴轉速度: 每秒 12 度 -> 每秒 16 度速限: 時速 35 / -12 公里 -> 時速 50 /15 公里 ======================================= 美國輕坦改動: A new proposal of a refreshed USA LT branch has hit the supertest. The T71 will be moved to form a separate autoloader branch, while the branch leading to the prototype Sheridan will get the T71E1 (aka T71 CMCD) instead. The Bulldog will lose the 76 mm Gun T91E5 cannon. 美國輕坦線在超測上有了個新的提案 T71 (現有的底特律兵工廠版本) 會被移去組成彈夾線(大概是指T69)，而連結到薛里登的線則會由 T71E1 (也就是T71 CMCD -- 凱迪拉克版本) 來填補 T7輕坦。猛犬則會失去 T91E5 76mm砲 (彈夾砲) *編:若此改動成真，T71/猛犬一車開兩線的情形可能不再 ====================================== Strv81 (瑞典百夫長) 消息: In addition to what has already been said about the Strv 81, some additional details were uncovered recently. So the tank will be sold as the "Defender", in 2 variations, one with an unique clown camouflage and one without it: Strv 81 “Sabaton” and Strv 81. The style should be similar to the one in the official art below. It will be in the style of Swedish punk rock & Sabaton. During Gamescom, there will also be small ads within the game, as it was with the film “Tree 5” (for RU), and, in the end, in the garage, a song will be played: Sabaton – Primo Victoria. In the near future we will try to get files or screenshots of the tank in its clown camouflage. 除了之前已經提過的資訊之外 (見: https://goo.gl/1ejqkW )，最近多了一些比較細節的消息。此車販售會循 "Defender/Obj.252U"模式，會有特殊塗裝版 Strv 81 "Sabaton"，及一般版 Strv 81以供選擇，至於特殊塗裝的風格會與下方的官方美術海報相似，會是瑞典搖滾風融合"Sabaton"樂團標誌。 Gamescom 期間遊戲內也會有小廣告，類似跟電影 "Tree 5"的合作(只有出現在RU服)。最後，在車庫會播放: Sabaton － Primo Victoria。我們會試著在近期弄到特殊塗裝版的檔案跟截圖。 #忘記貼上原有的圖 https://pp.userapi.com/c841524/v841524304/146e2/-MT8vcB8dkc.jpg

======================================= WG 對於關閉隨機戰鬥可以傷害友軍的看法 Relatively recently, many have started talking about Team Damage in WoT random battles again. All this happened after the spring developers’ answers where S. Makarov said that he was categorically against the removal of Team Damage from the game, but he was strongly persuaded otherwise afterwards. Recently, the Publishing Director of WoT mentioned that he was planning to test the disabling of TD (in random battles) this year on the Sandbox test server. Recall that TD(Team Damage) is an opportunity to cause damage to allied units, hence the TeamKill (s) – the destruction of the unit (in our case, the tank) of the ally. What to do with the “blue players”? and the main question whether Team Damage is needed in the World of Tanks? Should this ability be removed from random battles? For example, in WoT Blitz, we quickly shut down Team Damage – “There were many reasons for turning off Team Damage: many newcomers, whose shooting is not always conscious, tend to damage teammates and conflicts in a small team of 7 people are fatal (teamkills almost certainly lead to a loss).” 近期又掀起了有關隨機戰鬥中傷害友軍的討論，起因於 S. Makarov在春季的時候對於相關問題表示其堅決反對移除傷害友軍的機制，然而之後被說服倒戈。最近，WoT的發行總監提到他想在今年用沙盒測試看看(在隨機戰)關閉傷害友軍會如何說起 TD(TeamDamage - 傷害友軍) 係指可以對友方單位造成傷害的可能，並因此可達成擊殺友軍－毀壞該友方單位 (以我們的角度來看就是戰車)。那麼該怎麼處置藍名玩家呢? 再來是最核心的問題，WoT是否真的有必要有傷害友軍的功能呢? 是否該將其從隨機戰中移除呢? 舉例來說，在閃擊戰版本，我們迅速地將傷害友軍關閉－ "其中包含許多原因如下述: 有很多新進玩家，他們射擊時比較沒那麼謹慎，容易傷到隊友，並且在一個只有7人組成的小隊伍中任何衝突都很致命(殺隊友的話幾乎輸定了)" *編: 原文下方留言提出有趣的論點，如果移除了打傷隊友的功能的話，惡意來戳的(故意推擠你、貼在你砲管前的人)會變得無法解決。(看起來真有說服力) ======================================== 可能會有 HD FV215b ? https://i2.wp.com/i.imgur.com/yxV43sR.png

有可能會有 FV215b的HD化，但是最好不要全信，這有可能只是美術人員做的但要是屬實，這代表了 FV215b 要嘛會維持現狀(不會換車)，要嘛就變某種管道的獎勵車。 ======================================== 9.20 CT 第二輪 Patchnote *只節錄改動的部分修正的資訊恕略過不提 Improved equipment can be demounted for bonds only. Upon release of Update 9.20, Improved equipment will be automatically demounted for free from vehicles of all players so that they can mount it as they think fit. 加強型裝備將只能以天梯票券來拆卸， 9.20正式更新時會自動幫玩家免費拆卸加強型裝備，好讓玩家好好考慮是否要安裝上去 The Grand Battle type will be disabled by default for users who play on PCs with low performance. However, the option can be enabled in the game settings. "大戰"模式會針對使用電腦效能較弱的玩家預設關閉，但是想參加的話還是能去遊戲設定調整成開啟。 Changes to technical characteristics of American vehicles: M48A1 Patton: research cost was changed from 160,000 to 205,000 巴頓研發消費從 16萬提升到 20萬5000 ====================================== 2017 不會送小玩具金車了 UPDATE: According to the Minsk Insider, the tank turned out too OP and Wargaming did not foresee it… It was a bit worse than Pz.Kpfw. II Ausf. J apparently. 更新: 根據在明斯克的內部消息，原本預計要送的車太過OP而WG事先沒預期到...這台很顯然只比PzIIJ弱一點 Bad news arrive from our Russian colleagues. Wargaming, for the first time in 5 years, on the seventh birthday of World of Tanks, will leave everyone without a gift tank! We all expected the T-29 (Soviet tier 3 premium medium). 來自俄羅斯同事的壞消息，WG在5年內，在WoT的7周年首次沒送給大家禮物車! 我們都好期待T-29的說 Tanks given the last years in August: 以往8月贈送的車: 2013 — LTP. 2014 — Type 97 Te-Ke. 2015 — BT-7 artillery. 2016 — T-45. 2017 — nothing. Bonus pic from RU community: 附贈 RU社群的梗圖: https://cs540107.userapi.com/c638331/v638331647/51a38/ZJ_p6Cy8kO0.jpg

PS: I just hope they will give us the Ke-Ni Otsu instead. It’s in the game files since a very long time and WG did not use it for anything so far. PS: 我只希望WG是給我們 Ke-Ni Otsu 這玩意很久以前就存在資料裡但是WG從來沒有用到他 ====================================== 如有誤譯或語意不清處還請多多指教以及海涵 ==================== -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 218.173.4.95 ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Wargaming/M.1502449053.A.8E4.html

推

jacky9992

08/11 19:17, , 1^F

08/11 19:17, 1^F

推

osc63360

08/11 19:20, , 2^F

08/11 19:20, 2^F

推

tliu257

08/11 19:23, , 3^F

08/11 19:23, 3^F

→

tliu257

08/11 19:23, , 4^F

08/11 19:23, 4^F

推

Yijhen0525

08/11 19:23, , 5^F

08/11 19:23, 5^F

→

Yijhen0525

08/11 19:24, , 6^F

08/11 19:24, 6^F

→

Yijhen0525

08/11 19:26, , 7^F

08/11 19:26, 7^F

推

osc63360

08/11 19:30, , 8^F

08/11 19:30, 8^F

→

osc63360

08/11 19:30, , 9^F

08/11 19:30, 9^F

推

Pegasus99

08/11 19:36, , 10^F

08/11 19:36, 10^F

→

Pegasus99

08/11 19:36, , 11^F

08/11 19:36, 11^F

推

osc63360

08/11 19:37, , 12^F

08/11 19:37, 12^F

推

swecha

08/11 19:40, , 13^F

08/11 19:40, 13^F

推

osc63360

08/11 19:44, , 14^F

08/11 19:44, 14^F

推

aaaaooo

08/11 19:50, , 15^F

08/11 19:50, 15^F

推

lex65536

08/11 19:58, , 16^F

08/11 19:58, 16^F

推

ccc101419

08/11 20:01, , 17^F

08/11 20:01, 17^F

→

ccc101419

08/11 20:01, , 18^F

08/11 20:01, 18^F

※ 編輯: scoMico (218.173.4.95), 08/11/2017 20:22:35 HD化會不會有差別要看平衡跟貼近現實的權衡貼合現實構造而弱化的例子有: Fury(相較於E8)、百夫長此二者在SD時(Fury是跟SD E8比較)砲盾後還有砲塔的裝甲，致使當時兩者的砲盾具有相當優異的抗彈能力。而HD化後為貼合現實的構造，HD化的砲盾後方不再有砲塔的裝甲，使得這兩台車的砲盾現在頗為脆弱。而HD化後為平衡性而強化的典型例子是 T110E5 ※ 編輯: scoMico (218.173.4.95), 08/11/2017 20:38:47 至於巴頓，我印象中本來評價就不差吧，而9.20版又buff大小巴的車掌塔 ※ 編輯: scoMico (218.173.4.95), 08/11/2017 20:43:20 ※ 編輯: scoMico (218.173.4.95), 08/11/2017 20:50:39

→

hitlerx

08/11 22:00, , 19^F

08/11 22:00, 19^F

→

hitlerx

08/11 22:01, , 20^F

08/11 22:01, 20^F

推

Yijhen0525

08/11 23:48, , 21^F

08/11 23:48, 21^F