[情報] 5/26 Q&A

看板Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)作者 (Willie)時間12年前 (2014/05/28 03:26), 編輯推噓6(604)
留言10則, 8人參與, 最新討論串1/1
- Storm on quoting Discovery Channel (Great Tank Battles show) as a historical source: “Discovery is even more laughable than Wikipedia. My source are our historical consultants.” (SS: the question was, whether there were Tigers in Ardennes – there were a few, they didn’t fight though) 有人引用探索頻道(Great Tank Battles 節目),Storm:「它比維基百科更可笑。我的 資料來源是我們的歷史顧問。」 - for now, developers aren’t considering removing the rule where both sides have to have the same amount of arty (and scouts) (SS: this rule is not absolute, I think there is +/-1 tolerance) 不打算移除讓兩邊火砲(和偵查車)數量一致的規則(SS: 有正負一的容忍值) - Storm states that when it comes to historicity of guns in World of Tanks – made up tanks (WT E-100) can have any gun that fits, historical tanks can only have guns they had in real life Storm 表示,當要 WoT 要求史實時,架空車可用任何一門合用的砲,而實際的車就只能裝 史實砲。 - Storm regarding the assault mode: “What is there to comment? It’s a normal mode. I play it from the beginning without switching it off.” Storm 不覺得突擊模式有什麼問題。(意譯) - Storm, explaining why assault and encounter modes don’t have their own specialized maps and responding to a player who claims they are bland: “Because we don’t consider it rational to make maps for those mods only. You personally decide the level of blandness of a mode? Are there any normal criteria that determine “blandness”? Assault and Encounter mode are finished and polished. Historical battles are in the state of finding the correct solution.” 不認為突擊/遭遇模式應該有專屬地圖。(略譯) - Storm reacting on the “28 bots in one game” video: “You’d have to find out what is shown in there in general and how it happened. Personally, I don’ t have time to do this on Sunday. Sorry.” 關於1場28隻BOT的影片,Storm 表示這不干他的事。(意譯) - according to Storm, the TD share in battles has long since stopped growing and now is within normal frame. WG checks every month. 據 Storm 說法,戰場上 TD 所佔的比重已經很久沒成長了,目前還在合理範圍。WG 每個 月都檢查。 - too many TD’s in battles? “Statistics do not confirm that” and “We do not observe the dominance of TD’s” TD 太多?「數據無法證實。」「並未看到大TD時代出現。」 - long map loading? “We are investigate this issue” 地圖讀取花很多時間?「我們正在研究。」 - Storm states that the IS-7 buff planned was a hoax started by Jove (Russian streamer), there will be no buff (SS: to my eternal shame, I jumped on this too – basically, he – or someone else – photoshopped a fake screenshot of “Storm’s post”) Storm 表示IS-7 buff 計畫是一個由 Jove(俄國玩家)所發起的騙局,buff 不會發生。 - Storm doesn’t know whether the A45/FV201 will be a tier 7 or 8 and when will it come Storm 也不清楚 A45/FV201 會是七或八階車,以及何時出現。 - situations where you get the same map several times in a row are apparently okay 連進同一張圖好幾場的狀況是正常的。 http://ftr.wot-news.com/2014/05/26/26-5-2014/ -- In church, they say to forgive! Forgiveness is between them and God; it's my job to arrange the meeting. 《 Man on Fire 》 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 125.231.19.201 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/WoT/M.1401218762.A.89C.html

05/28 03:41, , 1F
IS7~ 不升DPM至少升一點金彈穿深嘛:3
05/28 03:41, 1F

05/28 06:24, , 2F
探索頻道的節目本就有些不公正,十大戰艦裡沒大和號
05/28 06:24, 2F

05/28 06:25, , 3F
就算沒戰績好歹還有帳面數據
05/28 06:25, 3F

05/28 07:24, , 4F
Discovery的十大XX都有個"量產數量"的評測項目
05/28 07:24, 4F

05/28 07:25, , 5F
大和級太耗資源 只生產兩艘 GG
05/28 07:25, 5F

05/28 08:00, , 6F
IS-7 不期不待 不受傷害...這台太中庸了XDD
05/28 08:00, 6F

05/28 08:38, , 7F
太好了 WG還是有點良心的 就算是親兒子也不能太寵他
05/28 08:38, 7F

05/28 11:21, , 8F
IS-7不是親兒子 是乾兒子
05/28 11:21, 8F

05/28 11:33, , 9F
有IS7的話CW一定有上場機會 苦力永遠不嫌多XD
05/28 11:33, 9F

05/28 16:45, , 10F
IS-7炮實在太爛
05/28 16:45, 10F
文章代碼(AID): #1JXERAYS (Wargaming)
文章代碼(AID): #1JXERAYS (Wargaming)