PTT遊戲區 / Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)

[情報] 8/13 Q&A

看板Wargaming (戰艦世界 - WOT)作者 (羽織)時間12年前 (2013/08/13 23:12), 編輯推噓22(22推 0噓 32→)
留言54則, 21人參與, 最新討論串1/1
原文網址: http://ftr.wot-news.com/2013/08/13/13-8-2013/#more-1685 = - there will be no Belarussian or Ukrainian language mutation (“for each extra language, a patch will come 1 day later”) 不會有白俄羅斯語或是烏克蘭語。(每支援一種語言就晚一天更新) - it’s not yet decided, whether you will be able to “see” Havok events, that happen outside your field of view (SS: as in, for example, a tank gets shot and some box mounted on the outside flies off under client physics, it’ s possible this information won’t be transferred if it happens outside of your field of view, so in your case, the tank will still have the box, despite on his computer, it got torn off) 在視角外的 Havok 特效不確定會不會讓玩家看到。 (SS: 例如敵人把你坦克上面的箱子打飛，可是這件事情發生在你的視角外，基於客戶 端物理運算的關係，有可能他看到箱子飛了，可是你還是看到箱子在原本的地方。) - Israeli branch won’t come for now 以色列線目前不會做 - it’s possible that in the future, ST-I will lose the M62 122mm gun and will have the ST-II option instead (two linked D-25mm guns) 未來 ST-I 可能會失去 M62 122 砲，不過會以 ST-II 做為替代 (雙聯裝 D-25 122砲) - Soviet tanks didn’t have drum loaders, but did have automatic loaders of other type 蘇聯坦克沒有鼓式彈夾裝填機，不過有其他形式的自動裝填機。 - for now, hiding your player stats from others is not planned 目前對其他玩家隱藏數據的功能沒打算做 - Object 268 in game has correct size, WG specifically measured it in Kubinka Obj. 268 在遊戲裡面的大小是正確的， WG 特別去 Kubinka 量過。 - IS-4 armor slope is historical, despite various sources claiming various data: “That’s because such mistakes were within the factory accuracy limits. One T-28 had one side 15cm longer than the other and nothing happened. ” IS-4 的裝甲斜面角度是史實的，即使有許多來源顯示不同的數據。 主要是這些差距還在工廠的公差範圍內。(曾經有輛 T-28 一邊比另一邊長 15 公分， 甚麼意外都沒發生) - OTO Melara M60A1 won’t be Italian top tier OTO Melara M60A1 不會是義大利線的頂車 - KV-5 gun won’t be changed KV-5 的砲不會更動 - no changes planned for Lowe 獅式不打算改 - DL43 Nahuel in game? “No comment” "DL43 Nahuel 會放到遊戲裡?" "不予置評" - the turret of the Firefly will be “standard” (SS: some player claimed it had two loaders – it didn’t. SerB: “Recruited gnomes?”) – in real life, some Fireflies had the machinegunner removed and additional ammo inserted on his place 雪曼螢火蟲的砲塔會是"標準"砲塔 (SS: 有的玩家聲稱它有兩個裝填手，實際上是沒有 。 SerB: "是招募了侏儒嗎?") 現實中有些螢火蟲沒有機槍手，原本機槍手的位置放了更多砲彈。 - Q: “Will Panzer II Ausf.J penetration be changed?” A: “Yes, it will be decreased two times” Q: "二號戰車 J 型的穿深會改嗎?" A: "會阿，會砍兩次" - no special tanks for historical battles (SS: as in separate unlockable branch) 史實戰鬥模式不會有特殊的車輛。(SS: 會在一個獨立的可解鎖分支) - VK3001P will not recieve 105mm L/52, SerB mockingly states he doesn’t believe that the vehicle could carry it VK3001P 不會有 105mm L/52，SerB嘲諷的表示他不相信那輛車可以載得動那管砲。 - T110E5 is doing fine statistically T110E5 表現得很好 - T-50-2 never had any engine stronger than 300hp historically T-50-2 歷史上從沒裝過比 300hp 更大馬力的引擎 - both T-50 and T-50-2 hulls shared the common turret (ring), therefore the “ improved armament” version (57mm/76mm can be applied to both) T-50 和 T-50-2 的車體共用同樣的砲塔(環)，所以兩者的"火力加強版"也一樣(裝上 57mm/76mm 砲) - Q: “What’s the chance of 128mm L/66 appearing in the 2nd German TD line?” A: “The same chance as finding it in serious literature” Q: "128mm L/66 在第二條德國 TD 線會改的機會有多大?" A: "跟在純文學書籍裡面找到它的機會一樣" - it’s theoretically possible that the change of firefighting mechanism will bring crew perk reset for free (“if needed and we decide, what’s needed”) 理論上有可能在更動滅火機制的時候可以免費重置組員技能。(我們來決定甚麼要做甚 麼不要做) - ZIS-6 was mounted (not projected, only mounted) on SU-122 chassis too, apart from the KV series 除了 KV 系列，ZIS-6 曾經被裝在 SU-122 的底盤上過(不過從沒計畫過要這樣裝) - no plans to make VK3001P a heavy 沒有打算把 VK3001P 改成重坦 - if/when additional armor appears in the game as a module/equipment, players won’t be able to allocate its thickness 如果遊戲裡面把額外裝甲當作模組或是裝備，玩家會沒辦法知道對方的裝甲有多厚 - it’s possible that VK4502P will drop to tier 8 and will be replaced by a Maus prototype, but not confirmed VK4502P 有可能會降到 T8，T9 則由鼠式原型車代替，不過還沒確認。 - arty nerf results: “no comment for now” 自走砲 nerf 的結果: "目前不予置評" - mission interface (SS: “XXXX kills left to complete mission” for example) within the game will come in 8.8 任務介面會在 8.8 引入 (SS: "還需要達成 XXXX 擊殺才能達成任務"，之類的) - language indicator on loging screen will be implemented 目前遊戲使用的語言會標示在登入畫面中 - the latest achievements added (Spartan and others) were designed by the same people, who did the other ones Spartan 之類的新成就跟其他成就一樣是由同一群人設計的 - German 50mm L/60 accuracy won’t be buffed 德軍的 50mm L/60 準度不會提升 = 完 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 36.231.22.236
推
08/13 23:15, , 1F
ST-I撐住啊!!!
08/13 23:15, 1F
→
08/13 23:17, , 2F
不過ST-II不是雙炮管嗎? 難道這是在troll人?
08/13 23:17, 2F
推
08/13 23:19, , 3F
ST-I這樣是好還是壞阿?正在衝= =
08/13 23:19, 3F
→
08/13 23:20, , 4F
雙連裝122!!除了穿深，打起來會超爽~~
08/13 23:20, 4F
推
08/13 23:20, , 5F
雙D-25在九階場能幹嘛? 雙BL-9還有點威脅
08/13 23:20, 5F
→
08/13 23:21, , 6F
如果還是原本的D25....，那很慘
08/13 23:21, 6F
→
08/13 23:21, , 7F
應該會有莫名其妙的buff理由，不然IS4乾脆整線砍掉
08/13 23:21, 7F
→
08/13 23:22, , 8F
算了，整條唯一的亮點都被砍
08/13 23:22, 8F
推
08/13 23:22, , 9F
雪螢步知道會放在美國車or英國車?
08/13 23:22, 9F
→
08/13 23:24, , 10F
俄式自動裝填就-7吧 不過聽說評價很差(裝填手很危險)
08/13 23:24, 10F
→
08/13 23:24, , 11F
但 如果穿深夠的話，雙聯裝122絕對夠OP
08/13 23:24, 11F
→
08/13 23:25, , 12F
有聽說，不過WG說不會裝，到是最近的-7裝基老10比較
08/13 23:25, 12F
→
08/13 23:25, , 13F
讓人期待
08/13 23:25, 13F
推
08/13 23:26, , 14F
我記得WG沒有打算實裝多炮管啊 就算有也是計畫排程很
08/13 23:26, 14F
→
08/13 23:27, , 15F
末尾的 難道這是很認真的troll法?
08/13 23:27, 15F
→
08/13 23:27, , 16F
要做也是M3Lee的比較優先=w=
08/13 23:27, 16F
推
08/13 23:28, , 17F
認真版的troll!! SerB又進化了嗎?????
08/13 23:28, 17F
推
08/13 23:49, , 18F
那條IS-7裝BL-10是認真的嗎?? 有點難分辨是不是troll
08/13 23:49, 18F
推
08/13 23:51, , 19F
IS-7? 哪邊?
08/13 23:51, 19F
推
08/13 23:55, , 20F
8/11的QA
08/13 23:55, 20F
→
08/13 23:57, , 21F
有這東西 但是我猜WG短時間不會放
08/13 23:57, 21F
推
08/14 00:15, , 22F
白俄跟烏克蘭語明明就跟俄文差不多都斯拉夫語系阿XD
08/14 00:15, 22F
推
08/14 00:25, , 23F
閩南語 客家話 漢語 都是漢藏語系啊
08/14 00:25, 23F
推
08/14 00:27, , 24F
俄文系畢的，真的差不多，沒唬爛
08/14 00:27, 24F
推
08/14 00:28, , 25F
但你跟白俄人說你們跟俄國差不多 他們會抓狂吧
08/14 00:28, 25F
→
08/14 00:31, , 26F
這就要請SerB去處理惹~XD
08/14 00:31, 26F
→
08/14 00:32, , 27F
SerB:不要玩會影響民族感情的遊戲
08/14 00:32, 27F
推
08/14 03:33, , 28F
白俄羅斯以前也是蘇聯的沒有差很多吧......
08/14 03:33, 28F
→
08/14 07:57, , 29F
朝鮮以前也是日本，沒差很多吧，試著對朝鮮人說這種
08/14 07:57, 29F
→
08/14 07:57, , 30F
話看看吧
08/14 07:57, 30F
→
08/14 08:19, , 31F
T34跟T-34也差不多阿(逃
08/14 08:19, 31F
推
08/14 08:51, , 32F
IS-7上BL10- reload17.5s aim2s
08/14 08:51, 32F
推
08/14 09:58, , 33F
上BL10感覺有點OP...
08/14 09:58, 33F
→
08/14 10:13, , 34F
還沒說要buff就有人在喊OP，還沒說要nerf就有人在哭
08/14 10:13, 34F
推
08/14 10:33, , 35F
白俄人可能還好，烏克蘭人保證暴怒
08/14 10:33, 35F
推
08/14 11:07, , 36F
IS-7裝BL10傳說很久了，不過裝的話其他方面應會nerf
08/14 11:07, 36F
→
08/14 11:07, , 37F
否則那個TD級別的穿深和傷害，怎麼受得了
08/14 11:07, 37F
→
08/14 11:47, , 38F
沒說不實裝多砲管 但有講過多砲管比多砲塔好做很多
08/14 11:47, 38F
→
08/14 11:47, , 39F
M3李是多砲塔
08/14 11:47, 39F
推
08/14 12:08, , 40F
m3李……
08/14 12:08, 40F
推
08/14 16:43, , 41F
主要是字母語源都一樣，真的有興趣的看看維基吧，
08/14 16:43, 41F
→
08/14 16:44, , 42F
跟日、韓，台、中，這種分裂原因有點無關，
08/14 16:44, 42F
→
08/14 16:44, , 43F
他們文法單字90%以上相通XD
08/14 16:44, 43F
→
08/14 16:46, , 44F
除非白俄跟烏市場大到跟中國一樣，那才有可能吧~
08/14 16:46, 44F
→
08/14 16:50, , 45F
當然這只是我從語言的方面來看，也許白俄跟烏真的
08/14 16:50, 45F
→
08/14 16:51, , 46F
不爽只有俄文選項吧~
08/14 16:51, 46F
→
08/14 17:02, , 47F
即使繁簡字體文法也都一樣 你看到只有簡體選項也會不
08/14 17:02, 47F
→
08/14 17:02, , 48F
爽啊XD
08/14 17:02, 48F
推
08/14 17:06, , 49F
我想表達的，是他們的差別不像台、中的繁簡差別，
08/14 17:06, 49F
→
08/14 17:06, , 50F
真的有興趣，三種語言的維基看看吧。
08/14 17:06, 50F
→
08/14 18:43, , 51F
德文英文是近親，但文法卻是天差地別啊
08/14 18:43, 51F
→
08/14 18:46, , 52F
請理解那三種文到底多接近阿XDDDD
08/14 18:46, 52F
→
08/14 18:47, , 53F
懶的再回了，專業內容反正沒人有興趣
08/14 18:47, 53F
推
08/14 18:49, , 54F
連英德都可以拿來舉例，我也無言了XD
08/14 18:49, 54F
‣ 更多 sunshinefish 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1I2ap1z- (Wargaming)
Wargaming 近期熱門文章
更多 近期熱門文章 >>
PTT遊戲區 即時熱門文章
更多 即時熱門文章 >>
‣ 更多 sunshinefish 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1I2ap1z- (Wargaming)